Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:32 pm
i am going to ignore hal of your postr as you seembent on poutting down not reading what i wrote.
one reason i haven't jumped on the bandwagon of this latest 'discovery' is that i am not sure if God is going to allow us to find the ark. my reasons are as follows:
first off, the question arises if He would allow that to happen, would it destroy faith? faith is the prime way to please God and to demonstrate to Him that people want Him and not what he can provide.
secondly, how could they prove it to be the ark? unless found intact and exactly like it is described in genesis, it would be very difficult to convince anyone that it is the real ark. this skepticism and ridicule may make it even harder to do the workof Christ.
--------------------------------------------
'without faith you can not please God"
"when i was a child i spake as a child, when i became an adult i put off childish things"
i wish the evangelical world would do just that and grow up.
faith and God working is not magic, magic is an illusion whereas God's inervention is a physicall action which does change results--miracles do happen and can onlybe attributed to the work of God (not talking about the crying madonna or weird things like that but real miracles).Some people feel that magic is an acceptable solution when other solutions are too difficult or too slow in the coming. Some people do not.
i can agree and i can agree that many evangelicals as well as othe religious people do abuse and misuse the tools,in thier haste toprove what they believe they undermine themselves with their statements and actions.I think we agree that any tool can be used and/or misused
one reason i haven't jumped on the bandwagon of this latest 'discovery' is that i am not sure if God is going to allow us to find the ark. my reasons are as follows:
first off, the question arises if He would allow that to happen, would it destroy faith? faith is the prime way to please God and to demonstrate to Him that people want Him and not what he can provide.
secondly, how could they prove it to be the ark? unless found intact and exactly like it is described in genesis, it would be very difficult to convince anyone that it is the real ark. this skepticism and ridicule may make it even harder to do the workof Christ.
--------------------------------------------
the scientific method (and the math method) cannot be applied all the time to biblical and spiritual things. that is just an impossibility. the same goes for the archaeological method. there are just too many limitations which prohibit such application. this does not mean that those disciplines are wrong, or out of touch, just that their scope has been defined in such a way that they cannot be elevated to divine status and remove faith from the equation.The tragedy of religion is that when the scientific method can't be applied to something
'without faith you can not please God"
one of the sad things about the evangelical/religious world is that somany refuse to grow up and that their leadership stunts their growth. it is one reason why i avoid many of the churches. so in essence i agree with you here as well, the religious take being children to seriously and forget that paul says we need to become spiritual adults.reach out for any answer that satisifies their child-like desire to have answers NOW
"when i was a child i spake as a child, when i became an adult i put off childish things"
i wish the evangelical world would do just that and grow up.