Tasmanian Site Discovery
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
I'm in!
Roy.
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
OK, write a 'treatment', less than 10 pages, laying out the principle chapters to be covered and some examples that illustrate them. Then sell the concept to auntie Beeb. They've got the scriptwriters, the production capability, and the money.Digit wrote:I'm in!
Roy.
Last edited by Rokcet Scientist on Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
I'm out!
Roy.
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
It's called natural selection
It's all for the best, because I want a stunningly attractive and highly intelligent 45 year old woman anyway!
We need ratings, mate! And credibility.
It's all for the best, because I want a stunningly attractive and highly intelligent 45 year old woman anyway!
We need ratings, mate! And credibility.
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
So do the rest of us!I want a stunningly attractive and highly intelligent 45 year old woman anyway!
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16015
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
45 seems kind of young..........
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
Well, that's settled then. One less bone of contention.Digit wrote:So do the rest of us!I want a stunningly attractive and highly intelligent 45 year old woman anyway!
Roy.
I await your proposals as to whom might fill that slot.
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16015
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
Oh...wait.
You wanted intelligent.
Never mind.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
You mean you find Palin 'stunningly attractive'...
That campaign video really got to you, didn't it?
That campaign video really got to you, didn't it?
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
We discount this one the Min!
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... C_Wetherby
Please note the working brake lights!!!
Roy.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... C_Wetherby
Please note the working brake lights!!!
Roy.
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16015
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
Rokcet Scientist wrote:You mean you find Palin 'stunningly attractive'...
That campaign video really got to you, didn't it?
That WAS good.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16015
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
Digit wrote:We discount this one the Min!
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... C_Wetherby
Please note the working brake lights!!!
Roy.
For some reason its telling me to download Flash...which I already have...in order to see it. I'll mess with this later.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
Flash is bad news. As your 'helper message' illustrates. It is corrupt as hell and crashes browsers left and right. That's why it will be replaced by HTML5 (and why Flash is blocked from running on iPods, iPads, iPhones, and iPod Touches).Minimalist wrote: For some reason its telling me to download Flash...which I already have...in order to see it. I'll mess with this later.
But you don't have HTML5 yet (nobody does). So I would suggest you try to run that video in another browser.
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
I was catching up on my reading here in the forum, and noticed this thread. So I thought I might add something.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory_of_Australia
Although Oz has been connected at times with both Tasmania and New Guinea, they are still isolated from the rest of the world by about 70km.
Of course this doesn't mean that at some other time humans didn't travel there via boats.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory_of_Australia
Although Oz has been connected at times with both Tasmania and New Guinea, they are still isolated from the rest of the world by about 70km.
Of course this doesn't mean that at some other time humans didn't travel there via boats.
Re: Tasmanian Site Discovery
Huh? The width of Lombok Strait is a mere 21 kilometres (13 miles). HE could easily see the other side, so he had a concrete destination to go to.Beagle wrote:I was catching up on my reading here in the forum, and noticed this thread. So I thought I might add something.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory_of_Australia
Although Oz has been connected at times with both Tasmania and New Guinea, they are still isolated from the rest of the world by about 70km.
HE was already on Java by 1,57 mya. So he either walked there or boated/rafted there. The boat/raft supporters will consequently have to accept that HE knew about boating/rafting long before he stood on the beach of New Guinea facing Oz. So getting across was feasible. They knew about boating/rafting, after all.Of course this doesn't mean that at some other time humans didn't travel there via boats.
I still maintain they walked/waded from New Guinea to Oz though (after boating/rafting from Bali to Lombok/Flores around 1 mya).
Because they could.