Page 45 of 57

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:18 pm
by Minimalist
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3052619.stm

Uh-oh....
Images from US space shuttle missions in the 1980s appeared to show ancient river drainage patterns beneath the Sahara desert.

Subsequent imaging turned up ring structures beneath the ice of Antarctica.
Hancock may be right about Antarctica after all!

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:32 pm
by stan
I have heard there is a giant crater under the antarctic ice...but what is a "ring structure?"
Like Stonehenge? :shock:

Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:04 pm
by Minimalist
Image

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:37 pm
by marduk
Hancock may be right about Antarctica after all!
Bet ?
:lol:

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:51 pm
by Beagle
Minimalist wrote:Image
Ok Min. Let's see if you get a Notification.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:10 pm
by Minimalist
Yep.

You must have felt like the caretaker here today?

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:16 pm
by Beagle
Yeah :lol:

I don't know why I was the only one getting in, but I'm glad everything is back to normal.

Whatever normal is. 8)

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:20 pm
by Minimalist
Oh, THIS is not normal.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:30 pm
by Beagle
Yeah, but this is as normal as it gets. :lol:

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm
by Minimalist
Since we are re-visiting 'normal' let's get back on track.

An interesting site about Sudan containing a series of links.

http://www.nubianet.org/about/about_history1.html
Throughout the last 100,000 years, the Nile Valley and Sahara underwent many dry and wet phases, which over such a span of time would have constantly altered man's habitat. We do not know what the people who used these tools looked like, but they were surely hunters and would have migrated in bands, supplementing their diet with gathered fruits, nuts and vegetables. This uniform early Paleolithic tool "culture" is known as the Achulean, and it existed from about 500,000 to 50,000 years ago.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:40 pm
by Minimalist
Another interesting article.

http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/Article/ ... n_Age.html
The idea that human history is a gradual but continual progression – starting from a state of savagery, with generations slowly making technological and social advances and passing these down, and leading to the pinnacle of western European civilisation – is a leftover from the Victorian era, part of the same colonial mentality which saw “primitive” indigenous peoples as subhumans who could be justifiably conquered and killed. Rather than a progression, the last 6000 years of war, oppression, misery and hardship are the result of a painful degeneration from an earlier, healthier state.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:55 pm
by Beagle
I've been away from the computer for a bit. I'll read these articles here and get caught up.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:11 pm
by Beagle
Good stuff, I liked the first one in particular.
There has been so much posted in this forum about ancient climate change that it seems undeniable now that mankind has endured periods of complete catastophe.

There's no reason to think it won't happen again.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:13 pm
by Minimalist
Yeah, anyone who buys waterfront property now is asking for trouble.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:06 pm
by Beagle
I think we're near to p414. Before discussing "Unseen Connections", I think it's worth noting that the 10,500BC time period is not the only time that the Sahara had enough rainfall to bloom into a savannah.

Around 6K to about 3250BC there was also a great deal of rain. That period seems more likely to have been the one that had the progenitors of the AEs, but it doesn't fit well with GHs' hyperdiffusionist scenario.

Speaking of which, he flashes back to on p.414.