Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 12:01 pm
Not really, as per the article he seems to be leaning in the direction of ID.ed wrote:Even the Pope is with us on this.
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Not really, as per the article he seems to be leaning in the direction of ID.ed wrote:Even the Pope is with us on this.
the Bible does mention that God has given all a desire to know Him thus the need to fill the spiritul vacumm in our lives. unfortunately some go to cults, others to false religions and still others to evolution to meet that desire.suggests that magical and supernatural beliefs are hardwired into our brains from birth,
i do not know if i would welcome this alliance as what version of ID would he advocate. i myself think that ID needs fine tuning as it is out of touch with the reality of whom God is and limits His ability to miniscule options.Not really, as per the article he seems to be leaning in the direction of ID.
I wouldn't touch that one. Anyhoo, Catholisism is the true faith and everyone else is a heritic and will burn inarchaeologist wrote:i am surprised, i thought more would jump on the first article about being hardwired for religion.
fair enough.I wouldn't touch that one
if you have to choose one at all try and choose one who's most famous act is saving humanity from destruction rather than one who's most famous act is attempting to destroy it himselfSo which god do you choose?
No because espousing ID is in itself a blasphamy.archaeologist wrote:fair enough.I wouldn't touch that one
proof that there is such a thing as intelligent design--- man has the ability to choose alternatives other than God. with evolution, you get no choice.
define prayerbtw, do you think that there is any evidence that prayer works?