Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:04 am
Frank Harrist wrote:
Now can we get back on topic?
Archaeologica.org
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Nice helmet shame about the face
Page 6 of 6
reply
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:46 am
If I can just post a couple of things without completely hijacking the thread-
The other day, British Muslims demanded changes to British foreign policy, claiming it was "alienating" them. Today, the same Muslim groups not only demanded new public holidays relevant to Islam, but also the creation of new Sharia laws with regard to family values.
Okay...off my soapbox now....
The other day, British Muslims demanded changes to British foreign policy, claiming it was "alienating" them. Today, the same Muslim groups not only demanded new public holidays relevant to Islam, but also the creation of new Sharia laws with regard to family values.
Okay...off my soapbox now....
Re: reply
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:11 am
RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:If I can just post a couple of things without completely hijacking the thread-
The other day, British Muslims demanded changes to British foreign policy, claiming it was "alienating" them. Today, the same Muslim groups not only demanded new public holidays relevant to Islam, but also the creation of new Sharia laws with regard to family values.
Okay...off my soapbox now....
perhaps it is time for the british to make some demands of their own, starting with a demand for consistency, at the very least.
an invasion in slow motion is still an invasion. if a german invasion was unacceptable to the british, one would think this one would be also.
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:24 am
Perhaps the Brits need to be like the French and start with head scarves?
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:37 am
it will never happenIf I can just post a couple of things without completely hijacking the thread-
The other day, British Muslims demanded changes to British foreign policy, claiming it was "alienating" them. Today, the same Muslim groups not only demanded new public holidays relevant to Islam, but also the creation of new Sharia laws with regard to family values.
Okay...off my soapbox now....
we don't change our foreign policy without it passing in both the house of commons and the house of lords
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:00 pm
if the reverse were true, it would never happen nor would people be allowed to raise the subject. the western world needs to gain some backbone.If I can just post a couple of things without completely hijacking the thread-
The other day, British Muslims demanded changes to British foreign policy, claiming it was "alienating" them
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 12:58 pm
archaeologist wrote:if the reverse were true, it would never happen nor would people be allowed to raise the subject. the western world needs to gain some backbone.If I can just post a couple of things without completely hijacking the thread-
The other day, British Muslims demanded changes to British foreign policy, claiming it was "alienating" them
They do seem to use the West's propensity for tolerance against it, don't they?
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:30 pm
while we're waiting to get a strong backbone we'll just have to rely on the fact that we have inter continental ballistic nuclear missiles and could wipe out the Arab world without leaving the officeif the reverse were true, it would never happen nor would people be allowed to raise the subject. the western world needs to gain some backbone.
Katyusha 0
ICBM 100
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:17 pm
that they do and they do it well.They do seem to use the West's propensity for tolerance against it, don't they?