pre clovis america

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Locked
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16033
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

http://www.cabrillo.edu/~crsmith/luzia.html
Luzia died in her early 20s. Although flint tools were found nearby, hers are the only human remains in Vermelha Cave.

The anatomy of her skull and teeth - including a narrow, oval cranium, projecting face and pronounced chin - likens Luzia to Africans and Australasians. Brazilian anthropologists propose that Luzia traveled across the Bering Strait, perhaps following the coastline by boat, from northeast Asia, where her ancestors had lived for tens of thousands of years since exiting Africa. Copyright © 1999 Discovery Communications Inc.

The site provides links to other finds as well.

The above speculation seems to be a forlorn hope of breathing life into the Bering Strait theory. It would mean that Luzia's group had worked their way south, bypassing an awful lot of prime real estate, before reaching the Peru area. Then, they decided to cross the Andes and head for eastern Brazil!

Why not just speculate that they rounded the Cape and worked their way up the other side?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
grunabona246
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:54 am

boat people

Post by grunabona246 »

well, we seem to be in agreement that the first people in the new world arrived by boat, and long before any land bridge existed. i'm sure we also agree there were numerous landings from different directions over many thousands of years, and it will take time for science to prove this to be true, but it will happen.
User avatar
Barracuda
Posts: 351
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Northern California

Post by Barracuda »

I think the coastal route was taken my most pre-Clovis peoples into the new world.

I really don't think it was anything so dramatic. Just the natural human tendancy to see what was around the next bend, or point, over generations covering thousands of miles.

But I also think that southern parts of South America were first reached from across the Pacific. Probably fleeing from intertribal warfare

Yes, Stan, that is me in my little kayak.
stan
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by stan »

That little yellow kayak looks like fun.
One of my friends has a couple of them.
The deeper you go, the higher you fly.
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

I actually thought kayaks were smaller than that. I just remember seeing them on the Olympic games. You take a nice picture "Cuda. :)
User avatar
Sam Salmon
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:30 am
Location: Vancouver-by-the-Sea

Post by Sam Salmon »

If you're thinking of Paleolithic people migrating by water don't think Kayak think Umiak

Image
User avatar
john
Posts: 1004
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:43 pm

Post by john »

Sam Salmon wrote:If you're thinking of Paleolithic people migrating by water don't think Kayak think Umiak

Image

now that we've discovered america. what next?


john
User avatar
Cognito
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:37 am
Location: Southern California

Boating to America

Post by Cognito »

If you wish to boat to America from Japan you don't need to do much other than to follow the existing sea currents:

Image

The North Pacific Kuroshio current moves at a steady 3mph. A trip of 6,000 miles would therefore take about 83 days without even paddling (which could cut the time in half). If you want to survive just follow the marine life migrating in the current, there will be plenty to eat if you're decent at fishing. Provision water for the trip, but catch any rain on the way and pray for calm weather.

Since you cannot drop bread crumbs into the water to determine a return path, make sure you memorize the stars' positions at night ... don't worry, you'll have plenty of time to do this. For fun, name the stars while you're floating along with nothing to do.

OK, Minimalist ... the motivation for taking the first trip? Following marine food as it migrates. 8) The second trip? Following the last group of people who went over the horizon, fishing along the way. A one-way trip, traveling east seems quite plausable.
Natural selection favors the paranoid
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

Nice map Cognito. It shows the current leading to meso-america. I've often thought that Australasians reached there by sea.

Fits nicely with another thread also.
Roberto
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:17 am
Location: Mississippi

Post by Roberto »

Research Article
Ancient transpacific voyaging to the new world via Pleistocene South Pacific Islands
Steve Wyatt *
Wildwood, Missouri

*Correspondence to Steve Wyatt, 15 Whitsetts Fork Ridge Road, Wildwood, Missouri 63038

Abstract
How humans first arrived in America remains a mystery. Although the Beringian and coastal options have been discussed in detail, a transpacific route from the Old World to the New World via the islands of Oceania has been essentially ignored. Of the many factors involved in completing such a voyage, besides an adequate watercraft, landfall frequency and prevailing winds and currents were most important. A chain of islands in the landless eastern South Pacific, with its consequent and possibly favorable modifications of regional sea surface currents, would have been particularly beneficial to eastbound mariners. Comparing present-day bathymetry with estimated late Pleistocene glacially induced sea level fluctuations suggests that latent islands may actually exist, especially when the effects of other geological phenomena are also considered. If exposed during the last glacial maximum (LGM), such a chain of islands could have provided facilitating layover points for ancient eastbound seafaring explorers, thus making a transpacific journey more plausible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Geoarchaeology
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 511 - 529

Published Online: 6 Jul 2004

Anybody read this article? Something worth consideration. Prior to LGM,
a whole chain of islands once provided layover points for early transpacific sea travel. Along with the currents to move them eastward. :wink:
grunabona246
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:54 am

islands

Post by grunabona246 »

very interesting, roberto.
User avatar
Barracuda
Posts: 351
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Northern California

Post by Barracuda »

Yes, Stan, kayaking is great fun, especially when you have Monterrey Bay a short drive away. That photo is at a world famous surfing site, Steamer Lane in Santa Cruz.

Kayaking convinced me that ancient people could cover thousands of miles in small boats. A friend recently kayaked from Okinawa to the main island in Japan. Almost 300 miles, but there were small islands along the way.

Beagle, that kayak is about 13'. Kayaks for whitewater river running and for surfing can be as short as 9', but racing kayaks can be up to 20' long.

Sam, you are correct. Umiak is Inuit for "Women's Boat." They were made to carry the women, children, and equipment. A Kayak is a single man's boat for hunting seals. If it capsizes you can do an "Eskimo roll" and roll back up. It could not carry enough provisions for a really long trip.

But I think the Polynesian Outrigger Canoe is the only boat of ancient origin that could have crossed the Pacific.
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

Roberto, I agree with Gruna. Thanks.

'Cuda, thanks for explaining that to me. I don't know anything about kayaks.
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16033
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

The second trip? Following the last group of people who went over the horizon, fishing along the way. A one-way trip, traveling east seems quite plausable.

That implies some sort of cultural affinity between groups that, I don't think, has been established yet.

The one-way trip does seem plausible but would enough of them have been made to populate two continents?
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

I'm sure that the migration to the Americas occurred over an 8-10,000 year period, maybe longer.

That's a long time.
Locked