Page 53 of 55
Why Deleted?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:23 am
by FreeThinker
Did I miss something too? Why is Charlie being deleted? A bandwidth issue maybe?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:30 am
by Rokcet Scientist
I'm assuming he withdrew his posts and pictures himself.
That's his prerogative of course.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:41 am
by Forum Monk
So what is the point with semi-nude avatars, RS? Even my wife glanced and thought I was looking at a porn site one time. I know you realize, the admin is a married female.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:46 am
by Mayonaze
I agree with Monk, Rokcet. I'm reminded of the saying "Your freedom to swing your fist ends at my nose". Your avatar is stifling the exchange the rest of us came here for. Have some consideration, eh?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:47 am
by Minimalist
Rokcet Scientist wrote:I'm assuming he withdrew his posts and pictures himself.
That's his prerogative of course.
Correct.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:50 am
by Manystones
Why?
about an avatar?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:03 am
by Minimalist
It's not my place to judge.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:08 am
by Rokcet Scientist
Forum Monk wrote:
So what is the point with semi-nude avatars, RS?
Exactly the same point as with your infantile avatars, Monk.
Even my wife glanced and thought I was looking at a porn site one time.
I guess she knows you best.
I know you realize, the admin is a married female.
No, I didn't know she was married (congrats Michelle,

, even if years ago...), but I fail to see how
her gender or marital status should impact
my avatars, since they don't break any laws afaik.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:41 am
by Forum Monk
Rokcet Scientist wrote:they don't break any laws afaik.
Neither do swastikas nor images of the Prophet Mohammed, break the law in most nations and yet most people choose not to display them. Do what you wish, RS, as long as it doesn't violate the board rules.
Cheers.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:46 am
by Rokcet Scientist
Forum Monk wrote:Rokcet Scientist wrote:they don't break any laws afaik.
Neither do swastikas nor images of the Prophet Mohammed, break the law in most nations and yet most people choose not to display them. Do what you wish, RS, as long as it doesn't violate the board rules.
Cheers.
Sofar, I have 1 mod declared in favor, and none against.
I'd say I'm ahead, Monk.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:49 am
by Minimalist
Personally, I wish you'd revert to the gymnast photo...which was a bit smaller and didn't cause (apparently) any controversy.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:53 am
by Mayonaze
Not to mention more symmetrical

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:58 am
by Rokcet Scientist
Naaah, I got tired of that one.
Lemme lay this one on the board.
Whaddayathink? Should we have a vote?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:06 pm
by Mayonaze
OK. Salma?
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:12 pm
by Rokcet Scientist
Mayonaze wrote:OK. Salma?
Who else!
