Archaeologica.org

Thanks F/T, I think that's the pic I saw of one of them. So they're in the UK. Good deal. The Brits ought to get the word out in short order.

is there suppose to be a pyramid under all this?

cos if there is one are they going to oncover the whole mountain?

Yamemaru wrote:is there suppose to be a pyramid under all this?

cos if there is one are they going to oncover the whole mountain?

That could be the best idea yet!

which is the alleged 'Pyramid of the Sun' -- compare it with



which is a dipslope in Durango, Colorado.

And from a field excursion to Cape Peninsula, New Zealand



Doug

dougweller

it is not like bosnian stone blocks

egyptian expert Barakat tested first day this stone blocks with hammer , he smashed with the hammer on stone blocks to see how stone blocks look inside , is it man made or natural








and what he found, this white material , wich is used to hold together stone blocks, and that is one of the proves that this is man made





Why should barakat lie if this is not a man made ?????????????????
why should he emerass himself ??????????????????????

Ciko wrote:

Why should barakat lie if this is not a man made ?????????????????
why should he emerass himself ??????????????????????

Why does being wrong make someone a liar? Whas he a liar when he said he found the Lost Army of Cambyses but evidently confused the sand dollar fossils that he saw with human fossils?

This gets more ridiculous by the day......that tiny amount of "mortar" is supposed to be holding those "man-made stone blocks" together?! Dear God...............

for some sceptics on this post


http://www.piramidasunca.ba/news/050606/DSCF7031.jpg
http://www.epigraphy.org/Alphabets_of_Interest.jpg


http://www.epigraphy.org/Epigraphy.htm

RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:This gets more ridiculous by the day......that tiny amount of "mortar" is supposed to be holding those "man-made stone blocks" together?! Dear God...............

Some Roman aqueducts used no mortar at all.

zagor wrote:for some sceptics on this post


http://www.piramidasunca.ba/news/050606/DSCF7031.jpg
http://www.epigraphy.org/Alphabets_of_Interest.jpg


http://www.epigraphy.org/Epigraphy.htm

Well, those last 2 sites are certainly ones a skeptic would take with a grain of salt, they back the idea that Celts left Ogham all over North America.

But the bottom line is that we have no way of tying that stone to anything other than the tunnel it was found in. You can't tie it to any 'pyramids'. And we don't know what the carvings are -- maybe there's a Lambda there, maybe it's all the Latin alphabet, Osmanagic's father thinks the arrow is a man, who knows?

Some Roman aqueducts used no mortar at all.

maybe so but these 'stone blocks' are larger plus their weight and slope wold ndicate the need for something to hold them together.

This gets more ridiculous by the day......that tiny amount of "mortar" is supposed to be holding those "man-made stone blocks" together?

my thoughts exactly wheni saw that picture. i do not see how such a little amount could hold such huge 'blocks' together. granted that may just be the remnant but if you look clsoely at it, it is a very uneven pore which means that the strength to hold together is not there.

i am sure they didn't have concrete vibrators back then but from the evidence we have ancient builders were well aware of how to do things that would last. this looks like a three stooges construction job and something the ancients would not be proud of.

again when you compare ancient structures to this one you see a vast difference in quality, method, materials and it makes one think that this is not an ancient building but a poor attempt to shore up the mountain.

i am now looking at the first picture that doug weller put up and i can't see why those stones are there? they are not thick enough to hold any weight, there is nothing underneath them for the purpose of being a capstone, they are not heavy enough to cause settling thus giving the reason for the spaces in between each stone.

so to me it just looks like a steep stone pathway at best. i would really like tosee Os and co. dig down whenthey come across these finds so we can actually see what is there instead of giving us photo shoots of wishful thinking.

Ciko wrote: egyptian expert Barakat tested first day this stone blocks with hammer , he smashed with the hammer on stone blocks to see how stone blocks look inside , is it man made or natural

How does what the rocks look like inside tell you if they're natural or man shaped them?

Kat

DougWeller wrote:http://www.hallofmaat.com/images/tesselated.jpg

Hmmm that image looks just like the "man made" pavement at the "pyramid of the sun" ... interesting how nature can create something like that isn't it.