Archaeologica.org

I have no idea what that pic is about.

The picture that Doug posted is a tesselated pavement. A natural stone pavement that looks just like someone laid out blocks.... a lot like what Osmanagich is claiming is man made at the "pyramid of the moon" in Bosnia.

Kat Reece

Sorry - but now I'm more confused than before. Did Os say that? This form of pavement would never, or at least never has, been used on any pyramid that I know of.

Yes, here is an image of the pavement at the "pyramid of the moon" in Bosnia




Its mentioned in this article
http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/fee ... 06081.html

A British archaeologist on Friday rejected claims that a hill in central Bosnia is a man-made structure that many local residents insist is a pyramid.

Professor Anthony Harding, who is president of the European Association of Archaeologists, visited Visocica hill and said the formation was natural.

my question is: why in 55 pages has no one mentioned this visit or assessment?

or are we only allowed to hear about what supports os and not that which questions him?

Dr. Harding just visited the site today or yesterday. He discussed it with me about two weeks ago but he wanted it kept quiet so he could blend in with the tourists and see the site for himself. He didn't want to be guided around the site.

Kat

I don't have time to go back through all 55 pages here .. but I assume the findings by the University of Tulza geologists has been posted here?

Kat

Kat - Hi and welcome to the forum. I guess I'm just not seeing it. When I have some time this evening I'll go back through this thread and see if that picture that you showed has been posted here. I just don't remember it.

And to me, I don't see much of a resemblance between those two pics. Thanks for the article but folks here have know from the beginning how the European archaeologists feel about it.

It gets hard for some of us to just get a steady stream of info because of all the hysteria that this has engendered.

If you right click on the picture and then left click on properties you'll see that they are calling it pavement at the "pyramid of the moon"

It has definately generated some hysteria.

That natural pavement is from MU civilisation,just have not been found proof for that ....
If you think to debunk Bosnian case with exeptional geometry of exeptional natural phenomena -you are on wrong path...because there are a lot of these exeptions showed in this case.That will say that Visochica and surrounding area is geological marvel.
Most likely there are geological paterns caracteristic for the area,but findings on the hill named"Pyramid of the moon"are cleary man made.
That dont mean that these are part of the "Pyramid of the god Atlantic Mu"
from the Myocene but probably of some structure from recent history.
I am amaised from some ,that dare to say what is what when there are no way that anyone can say for shore what will be below in everyday exavation.

Minimalist wrote: Some Roman aqueducts used no mortar at all.

And how many were the size, shape and mass of Visoko?

You mean, a "pyramid" shape?

f9 wrote:That natural pavement is from MU civilisation,just have not been found proof for that ....

Oh my.....

Exactly, Bob!

I actually had never heard of the Egyptian pyramids using mortar before the comments attributed to Barakat. IF I were interested enough I'd go looking around to confirm that.