Bosnian pyramids, photos

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:34 am

more evidence from bosnian moon pyramid

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:55 am

RK--your turn.

Sneakerz · Post by **Sneakerz** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 5:01 am

Well I have been following this thread for a while now and I sill don't see a pyramid. What I see is a big money machine. Just look at the pictures on the official site. There are tons of people there every weekend. If this is a hoax... it is working very well for the small town just at the foot of the mountain or "pyramid". I don't exclude the possibility of a pyramid being there, but from what I have seen up till now and how everything about this porject is handled, I have to say nay, sorry guys .. just diffrent layers of stone..

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 5:35 am

Minimalist wrote:
eratoh wrote:
stan wrote:

I just knew that goddamn picture would come in handy someday.

This contraption reminds me of that cartoon, "Howl's moving castle"....

...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:00 am

Cheers Arch!
Ciko,
That still isn't evidence of a pyramid. Go back a couple of pages and read the posts on natural geological formations. You either didn't read them first time, or you're choosing to ignore them. I suspect the latter.
And yet again we're seeing the same recycled photos, but posted by different people this time. This entire story is assuming the proportions of visions of the Virgin Mary at Fatima for some people.

f9 · Post by f9 » Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:04 am

Katherine Reece · Post by **Katherine Reece** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:21 am

The document was downloaded from the Internet. Is it possible to get a copy directly from the faculty in Tuzla? In that case we would know that we have a real reference here. That would be my first step. Could somebody ask for a copy? Katherine? Doug?

I haven't had any luck in getting in touch with them. The urls I had for the University don't work. If you can provide working urls or email addresses send them to me at kat@hallofmaat.com

Katherine Reece · Post by **Katherine Reece** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:31 am

RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:Cheers Arch!
Ciko,
That still isn't evidence of a pyramid. Go back a couple of pages and read the posts on natural geological formations. You either didn't read them first time, or you're choosing to ignore them. I suspect the latter.
And yet again we're seeing the same recycled photos, but posted by different people this time. This entire story is assuming the proportions of visions of the Virgin Mary at Fatima for some people.

It is amazing the different formations that nature can create when rocks fracture ....

This btw is a naturally POLISHED appearing sandstone floor

This one is my favorite

The independent statements I've read say that these hills and mountains were formed when Africa slammed into southeastern Europe .. this fractured the rocks and thrust them upwards.

Sneakerz · Post by **Sneakerz** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 9:39 am

I love this: the giant's causway. Thats way up in northern Ireland. I have been there. This is a natural formation from vulcanic stone!

amazing ehy?

Post by **Minimalist** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 10:31 am

amazing ehy?

Yes it is...but they don't go up on four, equal, sides on the same angle.

Ciko, just a hint, the close up shots do nothing. It looks most like, like.... like something, in the longer range shots.

Yamemaru · Post by **Yamemaru** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 10:47 am

actually giants stones where built by a giant.

Proof.

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:14 pm

they have discovered second layer above first stone blocks , 1 .1 meter above , now we have to layer of stone blocks

what do you say now

moon pyramid

today visited german slodier from eufor bosnian pyramid, and they said , nobody can convince us that this is not a pyramids

every day more and more stronger and stronger evidence

DougWeller · Post by **DougWeller** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:28 pm

Beagle wrote:This thread is 58+ pages long. That's a lot of reading. Over the last month many different people have joined in here. I think it should be noted again that nearly everyone is preaching to the choir.

The intensity about this excavation began immediately. Os is an amateur and most likely wrong. Everyone knows of the Roman post and the midieval castle.

When Zahi Hawass dispatched an Egyptian geologist, Dr. Barakat, to look at the site it was initially viewed as a step in the right direction. When Barakat said that he thought there might be a pyramid there, he was attacked relentlessly. His credentials were also questioned. I don't think I saw an attack on Zahi Hawass for sending him though.

I haven't seen evidence that Hawass sent him. If he did, it gets added to the list of silly things Hawass has done, which gets longer and longer.

Post by **Minimalist** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:34 pm

it gets added to the list of silly things Hawass has done

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:07 pm

Ah, the German Army says it's a pyramid, so it MUST BE!

Ciko,
How the hell could they discover a second layer of paving stones four feet ABOVE the first one? Are they digging this hill from the inside out or something?

You remind me of the Iraqi information minister who insisted that they were winning the war, while American tanks trundled down the street behind him.

Archaeologica.org

Bosnian pyramids, photos

Re: archaeological dig

reply

Re: reply

reply