apparantly i am as even i know that 30 skeletons and 103 artifacts a species does not make.Though im sure you know more than the 90 scientists who are experts in paleoanthropology
the evidence is scant and misleading. i could put 100 people i described in my last post, which you so elegantly ignored, with korean artifacts together in a cave and have archaeologists and antrhopologists climbimg all over themselves trying to be the first to proclaim they have discovered a new species.
obviously i am not the close-minded one since you ignored my illustration concerning the arthritic koreans.Oh and you are close minded
I supplied all the latest evidence including the research to completely map the nuclear genome of neandertal
though i am not strong in DNA research even i know its weaknessess and its failings.
it still doesn't make them a separate species. there is no foundation for such thinking, no historical proof no scriptural one either. all the artifacts prove is that they were made by a group of people and does not lend any credence to the fact that they were anything else but humans.I supplied info and links which even cited where they were found , who was working on them and what credentials they had
no it is not idiotic for we do not know when writing originated plus any language is writable, it just takes someone to sit down and figure it out. the pre-flood civilization could have written far more than we realize and Hapgood's book The Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings brings this to light.That was just idiotic as the last neandertal died out about 23k before the first written language
none of which is enough to build a separate species. it is all speculation and fabrication. shall i say PILTDOWN MAN? or PEKING MAN {the one built solely from one tooth} science is known for making mountains out of mole hills and strays far from its principles.Again i supplied the info and links showing evidence of about 30 skeletons which is More than any other fossil hominine group
