Archaeologica.org

Though im sure you know more than the 90 scientists who are experts in paleoanthropology

apparantly i am as even i know that 30 skeletons and 103 artifacts a species does not make.

the evidence is scant and misleading. i could put 100 people i described in my last post, which you so elegantly ignored, with korean artifacts together in a cave and have archaeologists and antrhopologists climbimg all over themselves trying to be the first to proclaim they have discovered a new species.

Oh and you are close minded

obviously i am not the close-minded one since you ignored my illustration concerning the arthritic koreans.

I supplied all the latest evidence including the research to completely map the nuclear genome of neandertal

though i am not strong in DNA research even i know its weaknessess and its failings.

I supplied info and links which even cited where they were found , who was working on them and what credentials they had

it still doesn't make them a separate species. there is no foundation for such thinking, no historical proof no scriptural one either. all the artifacts prove is that they were made by a group of people and does not lend any credence to the fact that they were anything else but humans.

That was just idiotic as the last neandertal died out about 23k before the first written language

no it is not idiotic for we do not know when writing originated plus any language is writable, it just takes someone to sit down and figure it out. the pre-flood civilization could have written far more than we realize and Hapgood's book The Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings brings this to light.

Again i supplied the info and links showing evidence of about 30 skeletons which is More than any other fossil hominine group

none of which is enough to build a separate species. it is all speculation and fabrication. shall i say PILTDOWN MAN? or PEKING MAN {the one built solely from one tooth} science is known for making mountains out of mole hills and strays far from its principles.

sorry i am out of this topic now unless someone honestly and concisely plus seriously answers my questions that i posed long ago.

Caught lying again, arch.

no... i just keep getting drawn back in.

here, maybe you will get the arguments you want atthis website:

http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... m.php?f=17

i am taking a break from all evolutionary nonsense but will keep my eye out incsase someone actually answers the questions.

Not needed. I have plenty of fun at Jesusneverexisted.com. It's amazing how free the mind is when you throw off the tyranny of religion.

I didnt miss your anology , it was just so missinformed I couldnt take it seriously .
Any disfiguring diease leaves readily recognisable effects on bone from arthritis to elephantitis (for a simple example watch time team when they dig up a cemetery )
Also your arthritic koreans left in a cave would have a 100% dna match with modern man .
They were a seperate species as they were built diiferent , looked different and had a different genetic make up .
They have no similarities to piltdown man , that was a single instance neandertal is not.
All the evidence is there , the work has been done , there is no doubt .

An observation : I check this forum every day and have done so for a about a year , Since you have started posting I have never seen you accept one single shred of evidence from any other member no matter how complete and concise, in fact , according to you all science and all scientists are wrong and misguided , and every member of this board has it wrong .
THAT is close minded

But Jesus loves him, Tech.

Mini
Is that his mexican pool boy ?
Or some fictional character from a book ?

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ain_2.html

The Neandertals appear to have been picking off the weakest of the beasts and herding them into a swampy area to kill them.

The findings are changing the way that scientists perceive the Neandertal people. "It seems they were a lot more savvy than people give them credit for," White said.

Nonetheless, the Neandertals couldn't withstand the extreme cold and were pushed out by the next ice age. (Related: "Neandertals' Last Stand Was in Gibraltar, Study Suggests" [September 18, 2006].)

Recon/Snipers had to have a beginning too.

Sounds like a feed lot operation to me. When were elephants domesticated?

The Neandertals appear to have been picking off the weakest of the beasts and herding them into a swampy area to kill them.

Don't most predators pick off the weak link?

Sounds like a feed lot operation to me. When were elephants domesticated?

theres no such thing as a domesticated elephant
http://www.hinduonnet.com/2003/02/07/st ... 850700.htm