Archaeologica.org

Welcome back, Ramiz II....I mean Ciko!

I see you haven't change the arrows so they point to the right places, as Merlin pointed out.

Nature frequently creates what looks like miracles.

The well is manmade. The rest, probably not. You have read what Colette Dowell said, right? From Dr Dowell's blog:
"There will need to be more evidence somewhere to make me believe it is an ancient pyramid, and I will speak little for Schoch, but he feels the same – we have many samples, none of which are showing ancient man made intervention to create a pyramid."
", I wish for Greg to post that picture that Robert sent with the hammer and the layers of strata to show how the pavement is just another layer of natural formation and not that of a side walk or terrace [ed's note: done]. The sections you see are cut out of the side of the mountain and they are cleaned up to look like they are part of a complex, as if the so-called pyramid is being manufactured when they find something they can “add on” to create it. It has changed very much. Also, there were some areas recovered that showed some geological formations that were very important, as they presented evidence that was not in favor of a real pyramid"

And you've learned that the inscriptions on the stone in the tunnel were put on recently and weren't there when the stone was discovered. And that the 'tunnels' turned out to be rather different than at least Schoch and Dowell expected.

Doesn't all that make you ask some questions, raise some doubts?

archaeologist wrote:

Schoch probably found the paint marks that say "Khufu was here

or 'kilroy was here'

No. Kilroy was 5th Dynasty not 4th!

and this is my photos from moon pyramid

it is hard to tell from those pictures any detail so it is hard to comment but if the bottom center pictures show concrete walls , not walkway,then it is possible that those walls were made to stop erosion or avalanches but if they are dirt then tha is another story.

here in korea when the workers are on the mountains, they use large stones as retaining walls and they do it for several levels, for the same purpose as stated above.

now these levels look like a pyramid shape as they go up on an angle but only for a short distance giving theimpression (if discovered a millenia later) thatthey could be pyramids when they are not and only constructed for construction purposes.

Doesn't all that make you ask some questions, raise some doubts?

yes

Hi Ciko. Thanks for all the beautiful pictures of your country. Not every one is an asshole about all this.

Things are disappointing at this time but you and your countrymen will all do very well. Good luck!

Hi, Ciko.
Welcome back.
It will be good to know exactly what happened
at Visoco in ancient times.

Ciko, Sorry things have turned out the way they have.

if this is not man made then it is natural pyramid




from the top of the moon pyramid

Good old ciko!

At least those stones are small enough so that you don't have to figure out how they could move them.

At least those stones are small enough so that you don't have to figure out how they could move them.

Phew!

they should stop working on the sun pyramid and fully concentrate on the moon pyramid

they should stop working on the sun pyramid and fully concentrate on the moon pyramid

why? there is no difference between the two, they are both natural formations with some ancient construction on them and digging on the one isnot going to change the minds of the skeptics.

can some archeologists and geologists explain this to me


conection material betwwen stone blocks as you can see it on this photos