"Land Bridge" theory?

Rokcet Scientist · Post by **Rokcet Scientist** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:17 am

Digit wrote:So I made a mistake, don't you ever?
And like our earlier debate? you haven't answered the question.
By the way Rocket not Rokcet or are you starting your own language?

OK, here's another tidbit of information for your language edification that you apparently missed getting that 'degree': names are NOT subject to language rules.

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:20 am

They are here, especially if you want the mail delivered to the correct address.

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:20 am

I'm lost as well on that Monk.

Rokcet Scientist · Post by **Rokcet Scientist** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:25 am

Digit wrote:
They are here

Wow, am I glad the world doesn't revolve around "there" . . . !

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:30 am

You mean it doesn't? Blast!

Rokcet Scientist · Post by **Rokcet Scientist** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:34 am

Interesting, isn't it?
See? When you know fuck-all, you (can) learn continuously. But only if you have an open mind of course.
(Assuming you have one to begin with).

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:37 am

Yep! Ignorance is bliss, I'm told.
I'v also got a degree in engineering so you can have a go at that as well if you like.

Rokcet Scientist · Post by **Rokcet Scientist** » Sun May 27, 2007 7:58 am

Digit wrote:
Yep! Ignorance is bliss, I'm told.
I'v also got a degree in engineering so you can have a go at that as well if you like.

Show me the bridge you built. So I can post warning signs for the people that intend to cross it.

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 8:04 am

Never built a bridge, but I did build some Rokcets, sorry Rockets!

Rokcet Scientist · Post by **Rokcet Scientist** » Sun May 27, 2007 8:10 am

Digit wrote:
Never built a bridge, but I did build some Rokcets, sorry Rockets!

Yeah, I saw those!
The name of one was "Challenger", and the other one was that fabulous Mars probe that crashed on the surface . . . !

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 8:11 am

Wasn't that an American one?

Post by **Minimalist** » Sun May 27, 2007 8:54 am

Forum Monk wrote:I not following this too good. The ice did go south enuff to be in the midle of th atlntik. So wots the point?

If we're still talking about this fellow with the reed boat, there was no extended ice pack in 6,000 BC.

Digit · Post by **Digit** » Sun May 27, 2007 9:00 am

I dunno Min. I lost the thread some way back!
I was on about the earliest settlers in the Americas. I think some of the rest of were as well.

Post by **Minimalist** » Sun May 27, 2007 10:02 am

Wouldn't be the first time.

Charlie Hatchett · Post by **Charlie Hatchett** » Sun May 27, 2007 10:03 am

The ice did go south enuff to be in the midle of th atlntik. So wots the point?

That eyce es en the edlantic.

OMG, ged agrep, dud!!