Protect and Preserve?

ravenwing5910 · Post by **ravenwing5910** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:40 pm

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/03/ ... l-Site.php

From the news page, I found this article. I personally am angered by the very thought. I strongly believe historical/archaeological sites, should be protected and preserved. What are the best methods of doing so?

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:47 pm

This really is archaeological heresy. Cahokia is supposed to be protected already but I'm unsure how far the protection extends. A law suit needs to be filed.

Forum Monk · Post by **Forum Monk** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:01 pm

ravenwing5910 wrote:I strongly believe historical/archaeological sites, should be protected and preserved. What are the best methods of doing so?

If it is declared a national historic landmark it is protected by the federal government, is it not?

Post by **Minimalist** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:12 pm

So is the Gettysburg Battlefield....but they shit all over that.

Archaeologica.org

Protect and Preserve?

Protect and Preserve?

Re: Protect and Preserve?