Smiling faces...
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:30 am
I see the menu of smilies next to this text box. We seem instinctively to know what they mean, and anthropologists have gone into remote stone age tribes to see if they have the same response. which they largely do.
Dr. Paul Ekman took that one step further, and studied the facial expressions of monkeys. Who have many of the same facial gestures. Monkeys cannot lie. their response to a situation is always truthfully written on the face.
With high speed video, he discovered that when a hominid tries to deceive, these original primate facial gestures are still there, but then written over 200 milliseconds later as the prefrontal lobe calculates the desired expression. Its not somthing a practiced liar can control; its an autonomic response.
Now, because so often men have relied on brute force to control situations, women have evolved the intuition to understand male motivation, and based on subtle clues of facial expression, been able to react even before the warrior knows he will strike out. Simple Darwinian response.
So- from ancient times, women, and some of the more beta men, who also need this talent, have applied it to their contacts with the warrior class, be it barbarians, or kings. Ekman reports that some people are intuitive enough to detect 80% of the attempted lies. You can see how useful this would be in business or political negotiations.
The historians know nothing about it. Sun Tzu seems to have a handle on it in his advice to know thyself, and then understand thy enemy. The natural response of the warrior is to objectify his enemy so that he does not regard the enemy as a human being, and will therefore not empathize or feel the pain he causes. Or suffer the guilt. PTSD.
Pick one: you can objectify, in which case you need to use force to control what they do, or you can understand, know what they will do before they themselves even know, and take the minimal action needed, if any, to deal; with it.
The Vedas & Chinese texts understand the usefulness of non-action. And they understand as well the usefulness of the Buddha face, which does not change at all no matter what you tell it. Hence the Orientals have been known as inscrutable.
This had a lot to do with the success of the Aryan Amazons, whose maternal instincts served well in the livestock business, and their descendants still have an instinctive love for horses. And if you go to a meet where they pit teams of oxen against each other, the teamsters are all adolescent white girls. Kin.
In like manner, they understood the body language and facial gestures of the warrior nations all around them. And because of this, they were repeatedly able to kick ass. But because of their own innate love for the cowgirl life, as soon as the Steppes greened up again, they were back to their home on range where the antelope & aurochs roam.
And today, some of their daughters are still among us, and if you try to lie to them, they'll rip you a new asshole.
Dr. Paul Ekman took that one step further, and studied the facial expressions of monkeys. Who have many of the same facial gestures. Monkeys cannot lie. their response to a situation is always truthfully written on the face.
With high speed video, he discovered that when a hominid tries to deceive, these original primate facial gestures are still there, but then written over 200 milliseconds later as the prefrontal lobe calculates the desired expression. Its not somthing a practiced liar can control; its an autonomic response.
Now, because so often men have relied on brute force to control situations, women have evolved the intuition to understand male motivation, and based on subtle clues of facial expression, been able to react even before the warrior knows he will strike out. Simple Darwinian response.
So- from ancient times, women, and some of the more beta men, who also need this talent, have applied it to their contacts with the warrior class, be it barbarians, or kings. Ekman reports that some people are intuitive enough to detect 80% of the attempted lies. You can see how useful this would be in business or political negotiations.
The historians know nothing about it. Sun Tzu seems to have a handle on it in his advice to know thyself, and then understand thy enemy. The natural response of the warrior is to objectify his enemy so that he does not regard the enemy as a human being, and will therefore not empathize or feel the pain he causes. Or suffer the guilt. PTSD.
Pick one: you can objectify, in which case you need to use force to control what they do, or you can understand, know what they will do before they themselves even know, and take the minimal action needed, if any, to deal; with it.
The Vedas & Chinese texts understand the usefulness of non-action. And they understand as well the usefulness of the Buddha face, which does not change at all no matter what you tell it. Hence the Orientals have been known as inscrutable.
This had a lot to do with the success of the Aryan Amazons, whose maternal instincts served well in the livestock business, and their descendants still have an instinctive love for horses. And if you go to a meet where they pit teams of oxen against each other, the teamsters are all adolescent white girls. Kin.
In like manner, they understood the body language and facial gestures of the warrior nations all around them. And because of this, they were repeatedly able to kick ass. But because of their own innate love for the cowgirl life, as soon as the Steppes greened up again, they were back to their home on range where the antelope & aurochs roam.
And today, some of their daughters are still among us, and if you try to lie to them, they'll rip you a new asshole.