Page 1 of 1

Caral - The Mother City

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:46 pm
by Beagle
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Heal ... 625053.cms




The ruins were so magnificent and sprawling that some people believed that the aliens from a faraway galaxy had built the huge pyramids that stood in the desert across the Andes.

Some historians believed that the complex society, which existed at that time, was born out of fear and war. They looked for the telltale signs of violence that they believed led to the creation of this civilisation. But, they could not find even a hint of any warfare. It was baffling. Even years after Ruth Shady Solis found the ancient city of pyramids at Caral in Peru, it continues to surprise historians around the world. It took Ruth Shady many years and many rounds of carbon dating to prove that the earliest known civilisation in South Americas—at 2,627 BC–was much older than the Harappa Valley towns and the pyramids of Egypt.

Solis, an archaeologist at the National University of San Marcos, Lima, was looking for the fabled missing link of archaeology— a ‘mother city’—when she stumbled upon the ancient city of Caral in the Supe Valley of Peru a few years ago. Her findings were stunning.

It showed that a full-fledged urban civilisation existed at the place around 2700 BC. The archaeologist and her team found a huge compound at Caral: 65 hectares in the central zone, encompassing six large pyramids, many smaller pyramids, two circular plazas, temples, amphitheatres and other architectural features including residential districts spread in the desert, 23 km from the coast.

The discovery of Caral has pushed back the history of the Americas: Caral is more than 1,000 years older than Machu Picchu of the Incas. They built huge structures in Caral hundreds of years before the famous drainage system of Harappa and the pyramids of Egypt were even designed.

But, it was not easy for Ruth Shady to prove this. It was only in 2001 that the journal Science reported the Peruvian archaeologist’s discovery. And, despite the hard evidence backing her, she is still trying to convince people that Caral was indeed the oldest urban civilisation in the world.

"There were many problems, many of them in my own country," says Ruth Shady, on a visit to India to discuss her discovery with other historians. "The discovery of Caral challenged the accepted beliefs. Some historians were not ready to believe that an urban civilisation existed in Peru even before the pyramids were built in Egypt," she says.

Basically, there were two problems. First, for decades archaeologist have been looking for a ‘mother city’ to find an answer to the question: why did humans become civilised?

The historians had been searching for this answer in Egypt, Mesopotamia (Iraq), India and China. They didn’t expect to find the first signs of city life in a Peruvian desert. Secondly, most historians believed that only the fear of war could motivate people to form complex societies. And, since Caral did not show any trace of warfare; no battlements, no weapons, and no mutilated bodies, they found it hard to accept it as the mother city.

That’s when Ruth Shady stepped in with her discovery. "This place is somewhere between the seat of the gods and the home of man," she says, adding that Caral was a gentle society, built on trade and pleasure. "This great civilisation was based on trade in cotton. Caral made the cotton for the nets, which were sold to the fishermen living near the coast. Caral became a booming trading centre and the trade spread," she says.

Caral was born in trade and not bloodshed. Warfare came much later. This is what this mother city shows: great civilisations are born in peace. Ruth Shady continues to battle for this great truth.

We had a thread on Caral some time ago, but it is just now recieving the recognition that it should. The city had pyramid platforms that resemble ziggurats. Trade in the Supe Valley and beyond was extensive. This is one of the earliest and finest cities in the world.
Posted in Archaeologica News. 8)

Caral

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:36 pm
by Cognito
The ruins were so magnificent and sprawling that some people believed that the aliens from a faraway galaxy had built the huge pyramids that stood in the desert across the Andes.
Someone had one too many tequilas. :roll:

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:22 pm
by Minimalist
We had a thread on Caral some time ago, but it is just now recieving the recognition that it should.

Hmmm....next year's trip is to Peru. Maybe I'll go.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:26 pm
by Beagle
http://www.indiaprwire.com/pressrelease ... 146221.htm

Another article on Caral, but mostly featuring Ruth Shady, the archaeologist in charge of the excavation.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:13 pm
by john
Its them Beringians again..............

Archaeology Magazine's Top 10 Discoveries of 2007

"As might not be apparent from the headline, 19 of the most vaunted discoveries and stories from the field of world archaeology in 2007, and for the purposes of this post, here's the current state of play in the ongoing debate over the age of Clovis, the early tool technology of the New World...


New radiocarbon dates kept the controversy over the peopling of the Americas simmering in 2007. An analysis of dates for the best-documented Clovis sites suggests the culture arose later and was shorter-lived than once thought, a finding that some say deals a blow to the "Clovis first" theories that maintain the big-game-hunting people were the first immigrants to the New World. Michael Waters, director of the Center for the Study of the First Americans, and Thomas Stafford of Stafford Research Laboratories in Colorado, used modern radiocarbon methods to re-date more than 20 previously known Clovis sites which had been dated with older, less precise techniques. All of the sites now seem to fall between 13,050 to 12,800 years ago. Most archaeologists still believe the Clovis people inhabited North America for at least 500 years, starting about 13,300 years ago.

Waters and Stafford contend this new 250-year window for Clovis in America is too brief for any founding population of hunter-gatherers to have dispersed across the Americas. Instead, they argue, such tightly spaced dates reflect the spread of Clovis technology and its signature fluted points through a pre-existing population.


But in a letter to Science, more than a dozen prominent archaeologists, including some who are open to the notion of a pre-Clovis culture in the Americas, insist there is no basis for Waters and Stafford's theory that technology may have spread more swiftly across the continent than humans themselves. What's really needed, they say, is more rigorous dating of all Paleolithic sites in the Americas.

"We'll be happy to date any Clovis site anyone wants," says Waters. "But the idea that Clovis was first just doesn't make any sense. Unless they had a time machine, there isn't any way for them to have spread across two continents that fast."

There are plenty of other stories from 2007 that will be familiar to many, all of which are worth a quick read."


Ahhh, yes, a time machine.


Fast forward to the "mother city."

One might deduce that the existence of said mother city was the result of an human inhabitation of the Americas which extends many thousands of years previous to the Clovis theory enforced by Das Klub.

Or........wham, bam thank you maa'm,

once those Beringians got through the ice,

they unpacked all their city building tools (from their backpacks, not their boats),

got a fat HUD loan from the Homo erectus Bank,

and threw up the Neolithic equivalent of Los Angeles just like that.


This will be interesting to follow.........


john

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:21 am
by kbs2244
What I found intresting was that the story was in the Times of India.
No attempt at pride of national history.