Tunguska was small asteroid

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Locked
Rokcet Scientist

Tunguska was small asteroid

Post by Rokcet Scientist »

Tunguska Blast Was a Small Asteroid
December 19, 2007

The Tunguska event, an explosion on June 30, 1908, cleared an 800-sq.-mi. swath of Siberian forest. Was it a UFO crash? An alien weapons test? Now, Sandia National Laboratories has released its own explanation for the Tunguska event. Using supercomputers to create a 3D simulation of the explosion, the Department of Energy-funded nuke lab has determined that Tunguska was, indeed, the explosion of a relatively small asteroid.
The researchers caution that we should be keeping watch for many more small, potentially earth-impacting asteroids than we are currently tracking.

The simulation videos are well worth checking out — they show a fireball slamming into the earth from the asteroid's air burst: http://www.sandia.gov/news/resources/re ... eroid.html.
Last edited by Rokcet Scientist on Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ishtar
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:41 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Ishtar »

Ohmigod!

Do we have any early warning system?
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

Yeah.

Someone shouts "Look out!"
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Post by Digit »

Someone shouts "Look out!"
Or if you're really short of time try 'Duck!' :lol:
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Post by Digit »

The physical size of the asteroid, says Boslough, depends upon its speed and whether it is porous or nonporous, icy or waterless, and other material characteristics.
At last! It's about time astronomers mentioned this, asteroids can be carbonaceous, nickel/iron, or stony, and perhaps combinations of the above.
A carbonaceous one would be extremely unlikely to survive an atmospheric collision, and a nickel/iron one would be unlikely to explode.
Aside from size or structure velocity is of the greatest importance. The same object striking on the equater in the same direction as the Earth's rotation and in phase with our orbit would be less destructive than if it struck out of phase.
What's happend to Monk by the way, haven't heard from him for some time?
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16015
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

I think he still has to work for a living. Doesn't get to sit around like us old farts, all day.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
User avatar
Digit
Posts: 6618
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Post by Digit »

Doesn't know what he's missing does he Min? :lol:
First people deny a thing, then they belittle it, then they say it was known all along! Von Humboldt
Locked