Page 1 of 1

Sutton Hoo

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:05 am
by gunny
Perhaps this has been discussed before, but why was no trace, except armor, found in the extremely effort ship burial of a body remains?

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:23 am
by kbs2244
You have me a bit confused Gunny.
Which cultures ship “burials” are we talking about?

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:55 am
by gunny
perhaps it was vague--5-6 century Viking style large longship hauled overland a consider distance and buried, as kings were in that era. No human remains were found, although his sword, armour, and personal items were. Were is the body?

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:58 am
by Minimalist
Was there never a body or have the remains simply vanished? 1300 years is a long time for organic material to last in a wet climate.

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:27 pm
by uniface
He would have been cremated.

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:10 pm
by Minimalist
The other possibility is that Sutton Hoo is a cenotaph for a king who, perhaps, was killed at sea?

Quien sabe?

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:36 am
by gunny
cenotaph--never considered that--but his helmet and armor?

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:50 am
by Digit
Like gunny I'd never considered that Min, good point.
Gunny, I doubt that that which was buried was anything other than ceremonial gear, never actually intended for use in battle, may even of course have been made especially for burial.

Roy.

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:44 pm
by Rokcet Scientist
Afaik Norsemen cremated their dead. Which would make those 'graves' memorials (cenotaphs). Ritual burial places.

Re: Sutton Hoo

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:12 am
by gunny
facinating era--would like to have been there---with my M16, of course.