Mediterranean, Appalachian, Pangaea Lunar Impact

[Kalopin]

Another synthesist , ignore the contrary evidence in favour of the "big picture ".

Easy to synthesisze when it all fits together so well. Ignore WHAT contrary evidence. Currently the consensus is all based on conjecture. There has been NO proof of the formation processes for ANY of the anomalies discussed, and it is quite simple to continue:
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is where the western edge of the American Plates split apart from the Pacific Plate leaving a 'slice' of tectonic plate we now refer to as the Farallon Plate that was subdued completely when the entire plate was pushed down on the east at the Mediterranean, raising the western edge over the top of a huge slab of tectonic plate!

Where North Carolina sticks out and beneath Missouri is where the North American Plate travelled over the Burmuda Hotspot on this same latitude. At this point the mantle plume pushed upward on the plate, maybe similar to an air hockey table. This is the point at which the scarring and scraping across the Atlantic basically ends. On the same longitude as the Burmuda Hotspot the Cayman Trench begins, as this area, out from Belize, was pushed downward hard against the mantle, breaking loose Cuba and Haiti to form the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico and the trench. It gives reason to believe that the impactor to form Chicxulub may still be present at the compressional boundary?

Oh yea P.S. Much of [revision] The current dating process is a farce!

[Tiompan]

As far as the Younger Dryas, it's pretty much 'cut-and-dried' as well. What other mechanism could bring in so much super-cold air behind it to instantaneously freeze all life throughout Siberia and the northern arctic regions?
You see, none of these questions have an answer but for a Lunar impact. It explains the cities beneath water, such as off the coast of Japan, although the ones in the Mediterranean came from a later flood, from the opening of the Strait of Gibraltar: http://www.rabbithole2.com/presentation ... _found.htm It explains why lake Titicaca rose instantly to 12,000 feet and contains seahorses and other fish that normally belong in salt water: http://nephicode.blogspot.com/2012/06/l ... esent.html It explains why there were so many depictions of dinosaurs interacting with humans: http://creationists.org/dinosaurs-humans-coexisted.html All details, that have been so far misunderstood and unknown, can be explained by this scenario alone!

I'm not really interested in this fantasy just noting another synthesist who ignore the contrary evidence .
Fwiw .
Only a lunar impact explains the YD , lol .
The Japanese underwater cities , even if they existed could have multiple other explanations .
There are no depictions of dinosaurs interacting with humans from prehistory .
There are no seahorses and there is no record of seahorses from Lake Titicaca .

George

[Kalopin]

I'm not really interested in this fantasy just noting another synthesist who ignore the contrary evidence .
Fwiw .
Only a lunar impact explains the YD , lol .
The Japanese underwater cities , even if they existed could have multiple other explanations .
There are no depictions of dinosaurs interacting with humans from prehistory .
There are and there is no record of seahorses from Lake Titicaca .

George

Well, we may argue for the Lunar impact hypothesis, but your argument for the underwater cities, depictions of dinosaurs interacting with humans, and the seahorses in Lake Titicaca [google the pictures, they are holding them, is that convincing?] will have to be with the scientists who have presented this evidence. Have you given study to the links?

Surely you can see how much evidence has been collected here, all pointing directly to this scenario?
Please give current explanations...

If this hypothesis is actually what had occurred, consider the implications

[Tiompan]

Well, we may argue for the Lunar impact hypothesis, but your argument for the underwater cities, depictions of dinosaurs interacting with humans, and the seahorses in Lake Titicaca will have to be with the scientists who have presented this evidence. Have you read any of the links?

Surely you can see how much evidence has been collected here, all pointing directly to this scenario?
Please give current explanations..

No evidence has ben presented in these links by scientists with any credibility in any of the disciplines required ,and even if the
evidence were there it would not point to a lunar impact .

[uniface]

No evidence has ben presented in these links by scientists with any credibility in any of the disciplines required

i.e. the people who, as history has repeatedly demonstrated, have to be dragged, kicking and screaming, to confront / acknowledge what's been in front of their faces for years ?

Evidence deals with observation.
Belief deals with . . . belief.
The two are NOT synonyms.

PS : Unlike most faiths, parroting party line dogmatics in matters like this does NOT make you one of the elect / cool guys.

It identifies you as a parrot.

[Tiompan]

Believing fantasies whilst ignoring contrary evidence identifies you as a mug , and wrong .

[Kalopin]

Believing fantasies whilst ignoring contrary evidence identifies you as a mug , and wrong .

And again, Please be so kind as to point out the 'contrary evidence' being ignored?

[uniface]

Doctor William Sargant is Head of Psychological Medicine at St. Thomas' Hospital. He is well known for his special study of conditioning and unconscious brainwashing.

SARGANT: It is the people who are not going to accept the group indoctrination who are going to make the great advances. I mean, Newton had to go on believing for many years against all-comers that gravity was not God, so to speak-- although he was prepared to admit that gravity moved at g + 32. And he said in this respect that he wished to point out that if God was involved, God moved in g + 32.

He was one of those extraordinary people who really was a crackpot. His greatest interest was prophesies in the Book of Daniel, the significance of the seven-headed beast and that sort of thing and he would spend sixteen hours a day in his rooms at Trinity going over and over this Biblical prophesy. He looked on gravity as a mere sort of sideline . . .

[T]his idea that you have to put all your research money onto very sane, normal balanced people . . . You're going to get no results at all, because a sane, normal, balanced person mostly believes what the group already believes.

http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2511 ... OfEyes.pdf

[Tiompan]

There are no sea horses in Lake Titicaca and there is no record of seahorses ever being found in lake Titicaca .
There are no prehistoric depictions of humans interacting with dinosaurs .
It is very unlikely that the there are any underwater cities just off the coast of Japan .
There are a variety of explanations for the YD , none of the evidence points to it being due to a lunar impact .
Any proponents of these fantasies are far from being expert in their fields .
The only connection is that , like the tooth fairy , they are all evidence free fantasies and unrelated to reality .
Provide evidence , not the ramblings of creationists or pseudoscientists , for any one of them and there might be something to discuss .

[Kalopin]

There are no sea horses in Lake Titicaca and there is no record of seahorses ever being found in lake Titicaca .
There are no prehistoric depictions of humans interacting with dinosaurs .
It is very unlikely that the there are any underwater cities just off the coast of Japan .
There are a variety of explanations for the YD , none of the evidence points to it being due to a lunar impact .
Any proponents of these fantasies are far from being expert in their fields .
The only connection is that , like the tooth fairy , they are all evidence free fantasies and unrelated to reality .
Provide evidence , not the ramblings of creationists or pseudoscientists , for any one of them and there might be something to discuss .

And yet you continue to postulate from a position of arrogance? Your statement "provide evidence' should be directed toward yourself. There is no evidence for a convection break-up of Pangaea. There is no evidence to contradict ANY of the so-called 'ramblings'. It has become apparent that it is you and your constituency that have provided absolutely NO evidence and still have the audacity to argue with no points!

Watch how anyone can easily make any statement with no backing:
There ARE prehistoric depictions of humans interacting with dinosaurs.
There ARE underwater cities off the coast of Japan.
There ARE seahorses in Lake Titicaca.
The big difference is that I posted links containing plenty of research to PROVE my points...
And here is yours- Convection alone slowly broke apart the supercontinent of Pangaea- well? Back It Up!

I now accuse you of being as the Tooth Fairy. Current beliefs are "evidence free fantasies and unrelated to reality" and this is where the believers in this current fantasy exist. Allow me to direct you to reality

Why would anyone want to live their entire life just believing what they have been told and not want to search for the truths?

[Minimalist]

There ARE prehistoric depictions of humans interacting with dinosaurs.

Where? The Creation Museum?

Don't start that shit.

[Tiompan]

Provide evidence for the presence or previous existence of seahorses in Lake Titicaca from a reputable source and it would be considered , similarly a lunar impact causing the YD , prehistoric depictions of human dinosaur interactions ,whilst bearing in mind that myth is a major component of rock art .
Creationist web sites are not evidence for anything but gullibility .
No need to accuse me of being the tooth fairy , I am the tooth fairy , provide contrary evidence .

[circumspice]

Boring, repetitive & predictable.

[Kalopin]

There ARE prehistoric depictions of humans interacting with dinosaurs.

Where? The Creation Museum?

Don't start that shit.

Please read all of this and give close study to the "Ica Stones", many depictions of dinosaurs interacting with humans and "technology such as telescopes etc" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ica_Stones ,also may want to search 'Dinosaur and Human Interaction in Our Times-The New York Times...' an excellent read, though the link needs shortened [not dealin']

Only a little study and it will yield the facts. Interpretation seems to be the issue. There is little doubt these drawings of dinosaurs with humans exist, but what do they mean?

[Kalopin]

Provide evidence for the presence or previous existence of seahorses in Lake Titicaca from a reputable source and it would be considered , similarly a lunar impact causing the YD , prehistoric depictions of human dinosaur interactions ,whilst bearing in mind that myth is a major component of rock art .
Creationist web sites are not evidence for anything but gullibility .
No need to accuse me of being the tooth fairy , I am the tooth fairy , provide contrary evidence .

'Hippocampus Titicacanesis'- Museum Tiwanaku in Peru "...is PROOF that there was a freshwater seahorse.": http://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/c ... p?sid=3086
Would a museum be 'reputable' enough?

There would be no other mechanism available to produce the effects and topography of the Younger Dryas other than a Lunar impact...
Most that consider themselves scientists are too scared to post anything factual that may be controversial and affect their precious reputation...

Why does everyone continue to avoid discussing what is currently believed? Because everyone actually knows current theories sound ridiculous?