Re: Black Death Asteroid
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 9:17 am
First two generalisations : Wrong.
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Hi uni -uniface wrote:You guys are the Believers.
I'm insisting on the unbiased consideration of information.
You know -- Science. The real stuff done the right way.
What you guys pose as standing up for and then try to fob off predetermined beliefs on people.
http://www.amazon.com/Albert-Einstein-T ... 0971962987James Mackave : Einstein's theory is not a denial of, nor an alternative for, that of Lorentz. It is only a duplicate and disguise for it.
G. H. Keswani : Poincare was not only the first to enunciate the principle, but he also discovered in Lorentz's work the necessary mathematical formulation of the principle. All this happened before Einstein's paper appeared.
Charles Nordmann : All this was maintained by Poincare and others long before the time of Einstein, and one does injustice to truth in ascribing the discovery to him.
Max Born : His paper 'Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Koerper' in Annalen der Physik . . . contains not a single reference to previous literature. It gives you the impression of quite a new venture. But that is, of course, as I have tried to explain, not true.
Harry Bateman : The appearance of Dr. Silberstein's recent article on 'General Relativity without the Equivalence Hypothesis' encourages me to restate my own views on the subject. I am perhaps entitled to do this as my work on the subject of General Relativity was published before that of Einstein and Kottler, and appears to have been overlooked by recent writers.
uniface wrote:You guys are the Believers.
I'm insisting on the unbiased consideration of information.
You know -- Science. The real stuff done the right way.
What you guys pose as standing up for and then try to fob off predetermined beliefs on people.
Well, uniuniface wrote: I have no dog in that fight. And -- honestly -- very little interest in it.