Page 1 of 2
Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:20 pm
by uniface
I think you could actually get behind this once the shock of temporal displacement wore off.
http://chronologia.org/en/how_it_was/02.html
http://chronologia.org/en/how_it_was/02_06.html
http://chronologia.org/en/how_it_was/02_11.html
If you just want to cut to the chase, the last one.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:39 pm
by Minimalist
I think that man got frostbite of the brain in one of those really bad Russian winters.
Should have used some more vodka.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:43 pm
by uniface
Typically flippant, shallow and ignorant response.
Striking poses and mockery are not the responses of a mature adult on a board devoted to more-or-less (with allowances) serious discussion. As adolescents used to learn.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 9:43 am
by uniface
Are you trying to make us puke?
Sure, Lil. Reasoned positions are always properly rebutted by revolting visceral imagery. That's how the scientific method works. You must be picking that up from Min, who is setting a bad example.
It's that, Judaism or PMS.
Care to clarify ?
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:32 pm
by uniface
Two of you now.
Lovely

Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:19 pm
by kbs2244
Wow
Just WOW
Where would you start?
It would be like sending Mike Tyson against a cloud.
For a start....
All his place names are post Christian towns.
(By conventional time lines.)
There is a great possibly they were founded or renamed after the popularity of Christianity.
All in honor of the religion.
As an example, I doubt there is a state in the lower 48 of the United States that does not have a town named Salem, or an Antioch, or even a Corinth.
There are even some called "Rome"
Those towns would really skew his locations and time line.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 1:58 pm
by Minimalist
uniface wrote:Typically flippant, shallow and ignorant response.
Striking poses and mockery are not the responses of a mature adult on a board devoted to more-or-less (with allowances) serious discussion. As adolescents used to learn.
After all this time it is hard to take your brain farts seriously.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 8:21 pm
by uniface
He sticks out like a sore thumb.
That's one way of putting it.
Pretty much sums it up, IMO.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:47 am
by uniface
There have been more and more of you coming online over the years.
No matter what you may care to believe, you're obviously cliches from the same mold, making the impression you were designed to make by a sort of reflex action -- delighted in solidarity with your comrades and pitching allergic tantrums when you encounter any idea incongruous with your programming.
You're in a class with global warmists, neocons, Moonies, Scientologists, "holocaust historians," corporate media shills, military brass and politicians whose malaise runs deeper than sheer greed.
You're toxic. All of you.
The hell of it is, you (personally) are keenly intelligent. But that doesn't sell what you're putting out there. To people who value the ability to think, you're what the Russian call "pretty poison." NOT unable to think or slow on the uptake. But subverted -- like a computer that's been hacked and turned to serving nefarious ends without the least awareness that it's been commandeered and re-programed to advance an objective not really your own.
That, at any rate, is how I see you in light of your recent posts.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 8:54 am
by uniface
kbs : it seems you've identified something you can object to. As it looks on this end, you're focusing on the fact that there is a Washington DC, a Washington Pennsylvania, a state of Washington and so on.
But does this really imply that the idea of there having been an original, eponymous George Washington must be an after-the-fact rationalization ?
Sure, in Scaligerian "chronology" they were all named subsequently. But suspend the assumption that the "traditional" timeline is even approximately correct and the picture makes much better sense.
And when you follow the lines of evidence and reasoning of the Fomenko school, they stand up.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:54 pm
by Minimalist
Uni's meme.

Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:23 pm
by uniface
Aluminium foil isn't adequate. What you want is the heavier gauge stuff used in insulation. Or an aluminium collander.
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:34 pm
by Minimalist
Don't pick on the FSM.
Remember.

Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:07 pm
by uniface
Yup, we're unstoppable.

And your kind is losing 'marketshare'. Fast!

Within 2 decades you'se will be a minority.
And you will finally know what it feels like to be one. The shoe will be on the other foot!
In your dreams, chickie poo. That rhetoric (& fantasy)'s well over a hundred years old. It's in re-runs of re-runs by now. Warmed over Lenin, Bela Kun, . . . the list is a long one. "Comes the Revolution . . "
But it never ends well for you, does it ?
Re: Jesus for Minimalist
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 5:13 pm
by uniface
Good old Min.
Fraudulento, ergo sum.
"I mock, therefore I am."
Very post-modern of you.
But tedious as hell after a while when that's all you've got.