Homo naledi was a virtual contemporary???
Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 1:41 pm
Did This Mysterious Ape-Human Once Live Alongside Our Ancestors?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017 ... n-science/
A couple years ago, NG did a flick on Dr. Berger's remarkable cave find. I guess i just figured they were a Million+ years old, maybe 2M. But now they fall around 250,000 years. Strangelier and strangelier. I don't think we have a family tree anymore, not even a family bush. I propose a third metaphore: a family orgy.
Given the brain size of a gorilla, it made me wonder about the Hobbits, with their 400 cc braincase, which is 200cc smaller than H. Habilis: Friday 21 April 2017
"Real-life 'hobbits' could be one of the earliest forms of human, say scientists"
'Homo floresiensis occupied a very primitive position on the human evolutionary tree'
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 94691.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017 ... n-science/
A couple years ago, NG did a flick on Dr. Berger's remarkable cave find. I guess i just figured they were a Million+ years old, maybe 2M. But now they fall around 250,000 years. Strangelier and strangelier. I don't think we have a family tree anymore, not even a family bush. I propose a third metaphore: a family orgy.
Given the brain size of a gorilla, it made me wonder about the Hobbits, with their 400 cc braincase, which is 200cc smaller than H. Habilis: Friday 21 April 2017
"Real-life 'hobbits' could be one of the earliest forms of human, say scientists"
'Homo floresiensis occupied a very primitive position on the human evolutionary tree'
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 94691.html
