Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:59 am
I forgot about the fundis - my bad.
Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
Hey Min, 40 days and 40 nights ain't nothing. How 'bout those 72 virgins?How about 40 days and 40 nights?
Sea level rising faster than thought. Could be true of earlier meltdown? I dunno.Satellite data is showing that rises in sea level and melting polar ice might be worse than earlier thought, a leading oceanographer says.
Sea levels, rising at 1 millimetre a year before the industrial revolution, are now rising by 3 millimetres a year because of a combination of global warming, polar ice melting and long natural cycles of sea level change.
What a dreadful thought... poor bastards are being sold a real bill of goods.Cognito wrote:Hey Min, 40 days and 40 nights ain't nothing. How 'bout those 72 virgins?How about 40 days and 40 nights?
And by the way, when you've gone through 72 do you get another set or must they be recycled?
Time to set the record straight on this one. Free ride is over you slow minded pupil of mine.marduk wrote:dude it is inscribed with Hieroglyphs that say who built itSo that puts me in the camp of those who believe the Osirion is an older building.
it was Seti the firstif you understood the egyptian beliefs about the afterlife you would already know the answer to that questionIn any case....why would a pharoah need 12 ships to get him through the afterlife?the Pokotia monolith is a mesoamerican styled statue carved from a mesoamerican mineral and the fuente magna has been proven fake more times than pamela andersons titshe didn't even know about the Potokia monolith and the Fuente Magna.
I know Dr C A Winters personally and although he did the translation even in his opinion its a bad fake
a very bad fake
they were about the worst seafarers in the ancient worldI've never known the Egyptians to be great seafarers
because there is no record of them ever going to sea
the one occaison they made a lengthy river trip (to punt) Queen Hatsheput who commissioned it had her tomb painted with murals of what she regarded as her greatest achievement
bit like you Cogs going down to new mexico for a taco and regarding it as your greatest triumph
I think you already know exactly why there were boats buried by the great pyramid
the Ka (not ford) of the dead pharoah was believed to travel the river of the dead on his way to heaven
at no time and at no place anywhere in the entire history of Egyptian descriptions of the afterlife does it say the Pharoah was swimming
This is another one of those bald faced statements that got you put on ignore status in the first place.the Pokotia monolith is a mesoamerican styled statue carved from a mesoamerican mineral and the fuente magna has been proven fake more times than pamela andersons tits
I know Dr C A Winters personally and although he did the translation even in his opinion its a bad fake
a very bad fake
I'm saying this very seriously. I think you have mental problems
you got until sundaytake a couple of days to think it over and get back to me
peace man
the Pokotia monolith is a mesoamerican styled statue carved from a mesoamerican mineral and the fuente magna has been proven fake more times than pamela andersons tits
I know Dr C A Winters personally and although he did the translation even in his opinion its a bad fake a very bad fake
http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_8.htmDecipherment of the Cuneiform Writing on the Fuente Magna Bowl
by Dr. C. A. Winters
he repliedDo you now believe that the Pokotia monument and the
Fuente Magna are
genuine, and do you believe they support the
presence of ancient Sumerians
in South America?
We would appreciate your answer and are grateful.
Best Regards
Lee
when he says monuments you have assumed that he is referring to the pokotia and the fuente magnaHi
From what I have learned about these monuments from
the people who discovered them I believe they must be
authentic.
Clyde Winters
notes lots of inconsistencies doesnt heCommentary
The cuneiform writing was interesting for two reasons. First, we find that
these panels have proto-Sumerian symbols mixed with the cuneiform symbols. Secondly, whereas, the wedges of most Sumerian cuneiform text point leftward, the wedges of the Fuente cuneiform signs point rightward. This may result from the fact that in the Fuente text , the letters are read from right to left, instead of left to right like the cuneiform text from Mesopotamia.
The passage on the cuneiform panels of the Fuente Bowl seems to be very similar to the Proto-Sumerian inscription on the right side of the bowl. This translation makes it clear that the passage complements my earlier decipherment of the Proto-Sumerian text also found on the left side of the Fuente Bowl.