I think the author's hypothesis makes sense. Me and my wife have talked about this particular topic a lot. Sometimes we've wondered if the hunter-gathers had a better quality of life than we do...with the rat race and all.
The hunter-gather lifestyle left a lot more leisure time on your hands, compared to agriculturally based lifestyles, which normally occurred along with heavier human populations in the region.
With the hunter-gather lifestyle, you'd kill a big buck, or buffalo, and 5-10 of you were good to go, protein wise, for a week, plus. And if the region was relatively unpopulated, human wise, hunting would have been easy.
To me, it follows that there would have been more time for artistic expression, creativity, spiritual pondering, and technological innovation.
Nice heads up on the article...that was really interesting.
David Campbell:
I don't generally get that involved with Old World archaeology but this
startling discovery in Kurdish Turkey certainly has implications with Gault
and Collins' revised appraisal of Clovis. This site was discovered in 1963(odd coincidence, eh?) and the monolithic temple dates to 9,500 BC. The builderswere hunter/gatherers the same as Clovis. Makes one think there may be moreparallels between the two.
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php ... subID=1007