The only claim made is that the prints may suggest that multiple events were represented.
you know tj your arrogance is over ruling your common sense and your petty insults just demonstrate your lack of character.
exactly why do you think the reports on the footprints are outlandish?
sorry stan, i wasn't referring to the footprints itself but the conclusions they were intimating. the fact that researchers have to come up with some sort of explanation in which they can not provide any corroboration gets old.
all they have are footprints, nothing else and anyone with an ounce of grey matter knows that something happened or many things happened at that site.
then there are these morons like tj, who are so childish that whenever someone doesn't agree with them that person is ignorant and unintelligent or doesn't understand anything they are doing. what stupidity and spoiledness to think that if no one argues your way then you have to take your ball and go home.
grow up tj, you are just another immature child.
If they are heavier, their footprints go deeper.
If they are children, their footprints are smaller.
If they are going in different directions, their feet point
in different directions
if i had a dime for everytime someone told me the obvious, i could buy this website and a few other properties. there is nothing said in that article that is earthshattering or news.
