dr. schoch and his contribution to archaeology

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:49 pm

http://www.geocities.com/dolph322000/

This stuff is easy to find.

For members - one part of this was written by Essan. The rest....you guessed it. Pay particular attention to the section on the Naazca lines and the Nebra disk.

Some of it is pretty interesting but it points out that that Marduk is pseudo-everything.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:08 pm

for members
pay attention to the date on the copyright declaration, its hardly recent
also pay attention to the fact that one minute Beagle is accusing me of being a member of the orthodox club and the next hes accusing me of being psuedo

i guess Beagle what youre going to have to do is actually do some research and prove anything at that website incorrect aren't you boy
what you're saying is that because you haven't seen any of it in a book by your favourite psuedo anarchist Hancock you haven't seen it before and so therefore it must be incorrect.
The world is full of things that you don't know and haven't read in a psuedo novel

otherwise you just proved to everyone that you have an agenda which means that you are in fact a member of the club
and also of course that you lack a little in the, research and intelligence department
roflmao

Graham Hancock is aware of that website btw
he wanted to post it all at the ghmb
but i wouldn't let him

Pay particular attention to the section on the Naazca lines and the Nebra disk.

btw Nazca isn't spelled like that

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:21 pm

Whew - it's been evident for a while now that every time someone calls you on your bullshit you become very defensive and insulting.

And I have never been a member or posted at Hancocks' website. You have.

You're not impressing anyone Marduk.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:39 pm

uh sure Beagle
i wasn't being defensive
i was pointing out that once again you were talking complete bollox
so did you make your mind up yet
do i belong to the graham hancock club or the hall of maat club
am i a member of the orthodox archaeological community thats hiding the truth from everyone or am i a psuedo archaeologist whos trying to tell you all the truth and fighting against the evil inherent in the system
laughable

obviously you decided that you weren't able to refute any of the claims at the website so that must mean that I'm orthodox right
but wait
if i'm orthodox why am i posting things on the internet that no ones heard of before ?

i'm sure you'll figure it out eventually
let me know if you need any hints in the meantime

this made me laugh out loud
you've gone from

some of it is pretty interesting

to

your bullshit

inside of two posts
is that some kind of record for a 180o turnaround or what ?
isn't that what you guys call flip flopping. you're not actually John Kerry are you ?

And I have never been a member or posted at Hancocks' website

you love him Beagle that much is apparent
you're reviewing his book in another thread and you attacked me when i posted in it because you claimed you knew i was anti hancock because i posted at maat
you're right
i am anti hancock
but i have a perfectly good reason
its because hes a self confessed anarchist who despises hierarchies and power structures
that is his motivation in writing fingerpaints and claiming there is a club in existence intent on hiding the truth in the first place
i.e. a nice conspiracy theory sells more books to people gullible enough to believe it
people like you beagle

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:51 pm

Marduk, you are really rambling now and you're embarassing yourself.
Getting your website posted has you a little unhinged.

its ghardly recent

Hardly isn't spelled like that.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:56 pm

i had actually corrected that error before you posted that if youd checked
whos embarressed, i'm certainly not. I already had two pms from other members laughing at your attempts to out me as a psuedoarch
so did you make up your mind about me yet
the way youre going you'll be accusing me of being a double agent next
am i secretly a psuedo author working inside trying to take the club down from the inside
or am i actually an orthodox club member trying to take out psuedoscience by pretending to be one myself

ooooh
the plot thickens
hehe

let me know when you've finished chapter two
if it gets made into a tv program i want 50% cut of the profits ok or i'll do a sitchin and threaten to sue you for $50,000,000 by the time the credits are rolling

Getting your website posted has you a little unhinged

you know i'm sorry i doubted you
obviously you are a top notch researcher to have noticed that its actually been linked to on my member profile since i posted about the Olmec heads

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:13 pm

so anyway
how far did you actually go to find my secret website that has my name all over it and which is copyrighted to me and essan Beagle

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:17 pm

psuedoarch

pseudoarch is not spelled like that.

You need to go back and read what you have been banging out on your keyboard. Really - you're embarassing yourself.

It's too bad that you weren't honest in the first place. We are pretty tolerant of different points of view here. But you have alienated most of the posters and have been making fun of everything as pseudoscience (which is a pseudoword anyway).

I read your website shortly after you came here - and I have invited you to post your views, telling you that I would support the topic and not trash it. (and my word is good). But I watched you continue to bluster and trash other posters views.

This is particularly unfortunate because you have been booted off almost every forum you have joined. And you had a chance to really present your stuff here. But you'll have too many people gunnin' for you if you post that drivel now. But then - I've already posted it.

Why don't you just try behaving yourself - for a change.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:30 pm

pseudoarch is not spelled like that.

http://www.dharma-haven.org/science/psu ... cience.htm

It's too bad that you weren't honest in the first place

unsubstantiated claim Arch and also against the code of conduct
obviously now your clutching at straws youve started with the personal insults
for shame. what did i do that was dishonest anywhere ?

I read your website shortly after you came here - and I have invited you to post your views

no you didnt you claimed that none of my views were valid because i was a member at maat

This is particularly unfortunate because you have been booted off almost every forum you have joined

can you name all these forums you are claiming ive been booted off of Beagle
either put up or shut up
i really haven't got time to waste with people who live in fantasy worlds
okies ?

i'd also like to point out that you attacked me because i posted my view of Schoch's work "voyages of the pyramid builders"
have you even read it ?

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 7:57 pm

You know very well that google will always find a website where the webmaster has not spelled the word correctly.

if youd checked

youd is not a word.

So Marduk, you have taken many opportunities to poke fun at other peoples typos. You're no different except that you're impolite. I'm not going to bother to make my point further.

I am not Arch.

I cannot list the websites you have been banned from. I have never been banned anywhere. If I had been I think I would feel badly about it.

The facts are on your website. You preach orthodoxy and rudely make fun of other people for speculating. However, you are the one with the largest pseudoskeleton in his closet. You're a fake.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:06 pm

I'm not going to bother to make my point further.

you had no point to make to start with except that you lack the intelligence to prove anything either way

I cannot list the websites you have been banned from

there were two
one was ghmb because i upset grahams psuedohypocrisy and lost him sales. i was banned on no fewer than 13 occaisons
the other was supernatural world because when i asked the owner to remove my membership he refused so i slagged off the mod team until he did

If I had been I think I would feel badly about it

thats because you've never been banned it is actually quite liberating and nothing to be ashamed of when the only time i was banned against my will it was because i posted the truth and hadn't at any time breached the c of c. further proving that Hancock was a conman the same as Osmaganic who he was supporting

However, you are the one with the largest pseudoskeleton in his closet

so its a psuedoskeleton now is it
i suppose that makes a change from

interesting

or

bullshit

in fact i wrote that website for people like you to enjoy beagle
its a shame you don't appreciate it
are you also calling Essan a psuedo for posting some of his own research there

truth of the matter is this
your original attack on me in this thread was unjustified
you then tried to bolster it with lies about my honesty and my banning record
this proves to anyone reading this that not only are you a liar but you are also a very small immature child Beagle
and a very very stupid child at that
you claim you're not Arch
but boy are you acting like him

john · Post by **john** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:18 pm

you know what, folks?

i'm starting to get a little warm here. when i found this site, i thought "great". now, a little more experienced, i'm finding that what goes on here is way more the equivalent of archeological domestic violence than an actual exchange of ideas.

respect your bretheren and sisteren, degreed or not.

life is too short for pissant ego-posturings.

i get my rush from learning.

john

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:19 pm

unsubstantiated claim Arch and also against the code of conduct

You're confused Marduk.

Everything I said about your website is true. Sorry you don't understand that but the other folks here will.

Essan (Andy) actually wrote a good article about the frozen Siberian mammoths. I didn't agree with everything but that's not the point. It was well written and well referenced. Much better than anything you wrote.

It's after 0400 in England. You should get a job.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:34 pm

now youre really like Arch
you know full well that the unsubstantiated claim you made was that i was dishonest
and so does everyone whos just read this
i expect you lost whatever little reputation you had left in this exchange
now go pick on someone you can handle
like shirley temple of buckwheat from the little rascals
I'm far too smart for you
and thanks but I've got a job
and it pays a hell of a lot more money than you'll ever see
and no
i'm not even going to tell you what it is until next year

claiming to be on the side of the other folks here like your doing Beagle is probably not winning you any friends
i can see how everyones rallied around you
eh eh
hahahaha

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:46 pm

I said that you were a fake. I stand by that.

I think my reputation, as you call it, is just fine.

It's really important for you to understand that I, or anyone else here, can "handle" you. I don't have any idea where you get the notion that you have something special going on.

Everyone has watched you claiiming that so much that we discuss is pseudoscience. And here you are claiming that the Nazca lines have a Sumerian inscription couched inside of them. How many personalities do you have?