Evolutionary news

ReneDescartes · Post by **ReneDescartes** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:02 am

Look Arch I can give you about 50 links to the story,the discovery is done in 1878 in a layer of clay at a depth of minus 322 meters below surface .THe layers date from the Carbon.
The facts have been documented by the scientific community at that time .Extensive digging brought a lot of remains to the surface .Enough to fill amuseum .I suggest you do some research on the internet before dismissing well established facts because they fail to comply with the bible .
You might doubt the exactitude of carbon dating because it does not fit your needs but a meter is a meter .You will not ask me to provide the measuring stick, I hope .

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:07 am

ah but Rene
that clay was laid down by the flood of Noah

LadyV · Post by **LadyV** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:22 am

archaeologist wrote:
right back atcha.
so to base your point on an accusation of supposed forgery just means that you side with those who will go to any length to hide the truth.

I for one, do not want the truth hidden from me! I am in constant search to root out the truth. Please, please show the proof you have to support the bible, to support your god is the only one, to support that Christianity is the only true religion! Please give me your evidence...not quoting scripture as that is not proof of anything. I will take any evidence you have seriously!

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:28 am

we have already destroyed any evidence he had seriously

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:06 am

Allright LadyV! Musician eh? I'm a musician too. I was a proffesional singer for about 15 years. I'll listen to your stuff later at home. I can't do it on my work computer. You're hot!

Post by **Minimalist** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:18 am

Keep giving arch the shaft, Rene!

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:38 pm

Keep giving arch the shaft, Rene!

nice pun.

can give you about 50 links to the story,the discovery is done in 1878 in a layer of clay at a depth of minus 322 meters below surface

i bet not one of them will state the actual depth of the find.

I suggest you do some research on the internet before dismissing well established facts because they fail to comply with the bible .

you haven't proven them as fact or that they disprove the Bible. so far all you have said is these bones were found together. that is it. what is your point?

You might doubt the exactitude of carbon dating because it does not fit your needs but a meter is a meter

you and most other evolutionists assume too much when it comes to 'evidence' and you haven't stated what these bones prove. you give me minimal information and then demand a rational explanation. yoour unrealistic.

then when i point out a glaring error in your link you then come back and say:

I can give you about 50 links to the story

but you don't even give me one, you want to rely on the error prone link. which is typical of evolutionists, you think finches with mutations is proof that humans came from apes and it isn't even close.

gicve uunbiased, honest, crdedible information and then i will give you a response after i check it out.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:41 pm

I for one, do not want the truth hidden from me! I am in constant search to root out the truth. Please, please show the proof you have to support the bible, to support your god is the only one, to support that Christianity is the only true religion

start by reading my responses in the thrreads: inteligent design and Noah's flood and thenif you have questions just ask.

by the way, are you the person who painted all those wolves and indian woman paintings? among others ut they all had the young maiden as their subject?

Post by **Minimalist** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:47 pm

nice pun.

I do some of my best work with puns.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:49 pm

start by reading my responses in the thrreads: inteligent design and Noah's flood and thenif you have questions just ask.

alternatively you might like to wrap a 12LB club hammer in velvet and whack yourself round the back of the head for a few hours while screaming out loud
the effect is much the same

ReneDescartes · Post by **ReneDescartes** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:18 pm

Ok Arch as usualyou will not accept my word for anything,not even for a discovery which was well established and has a multitude of links if you would only care to fill in iguanodons bernissart or even iguanodon bernissartensis in google as the species is labeled .
http://www.bway.net/~noel/paleo/iguan.html
http://www.dinosaur.pref.fukui.jp/en/dd ... ensis.html
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/posti ... eply&t=252
http://www.researchcasting.ca/iguanodon ... tensis.htm
the latter link specifies the level at which it was found .
I can offer you probably twenty links in English,German,French,Japanese or any language you want .Apparently you went through no effort at all as allready you had dismissed the possibility as contrary to your belief ,as usual without even bothering to check .Quite untypical for the open mind you claim to have or the inquisitive spirit you need to practise science.
If only you would be open to arguments ,nowI lay it on you to come up with an explanation as to why all these fossils where found at that level ,in fact some were even found at a deeper level as well.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:43 pm

Arch as usualyou will not accept my word for anything

of course not, that would be dumb. 2 of the three links did not specify a depth while only one did. the fourth linked back to here so i ignored it. why would i google that for? you are the one pressing the issue by throwing up a post with no point or reason except to askmy opinion.

why would i bother when i have no idea what you are getting at? so as it stands, i will contest the depth of the discovery until i see some point from you.

i am not going to comment on something that is just thrown at me without knowing what you are getting at. which by the way, the links provide very little information as well so make your point and stop playing stupid games.

right now all i can say is: 'woo hoo he found some bones. o wow.'

stan · Post by **stan** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:35 pm

Psycho killer raccoons terrorize Olympia

OLYMPIA, Washington - A fierce group of raccoons has killed 10 cats, attacked a small dog and bitten at least one pet owner who had to get rabies shots, residents of Olympia say.

"It‘s a new breed," said Tamara Keeton, who with Kari Hall started a raccoon watch after an emotional neighborhood meeting drew 40 people. "They‘re urban raccoons, and they‘re not afraid."

One goal of the patrol is to get residents to stop feeding raccoons and to keep pets and pet food indoors.

"I was watching her like a hawk, but she snuck out," Rolle said. "Then I heard this hideous sound — a coyote-type high pitch ... It was vicious. They were focused on ripping her apart."

http://www.localnewswatch.com/skyvalley ... ews&id=452

Note the quotation: "Its a new breed." Seems we are seeing evolution in progress. At least their behavior has changed...hunting in packs like dogs, attacking large animals...Raccoons are usually solitary, eating small things like insects, frogs, and crayfish...and raiding dog food bowls.

Post by **Minimalist** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:43 pm

Perhaps they formed a gang?

The Bloods, the Crips, and now the Raccoons?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 6:56 pm

"Its a new breed." Seems we are seeing evolution in progress

we have used that phrase 'its a new breed' for generations and it never meant anything related to evolution. all it is is a pack of raccoons who have been driven to a hungerr they have never experienced before.

talk about desparation to prove a theory that isn't true.