Noah's Flood...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:10 pm

SCIENCE [!--Ed.] has found evidence of a global disaster which may have quickened the dinosaur departure from this mortal coil.

They have found no evidence of a Global Flood.

Your move. . . .

--J.D.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:12 pm

archaeologist wrote:how amny times do i have to say there was a flood before you believe it?

None.

You merely need to provide evidence.

I have evidence:

Who do you think put that smile on her face? It certainly was not Tom "Gayer than a Burlesque Show" Cruise.

Where is yours?

--J.D.

Post by **Minimalist** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:35 pm

how amny times do i have to say there was a flood before you believe it?

Given your credibility, you'd be dead before you finished.

john · Post by **john** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:45 pm

doc -

you old dog, you.

john

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:47 pm

I could never commit the one sin Big Daddy refuses to forgive:

You are committing the greatest of sins! Denying the passions of a woman! All other sins God will forgive!

--Zorba

--J. "She Begged Me!" D.

john · Post by **john** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:15 pm

heewhat?

you are not possibly referring to "the force that through the green fuse drives the flower?"

or words to that effect.

distinctly anti-christ.

Baaaad Doctor!

john

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:26 pm

She likes me bad. . . .

--J. "Tom? Come Out of the Closet!" D.

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:42 pm

Well I don't know about staying on topic, but this thread has become highly entertaining. Nicole Kidman indeed! I believe the part about the eating cheetohs in your underwear. I bet she ain't there with cheesy fingers beside you. And for the record Conrad and Melville were both boring as hell.
Doc, I think you have made a very good case which has baffled arch. He hasn't posted anything resembling an appropriate and credible response. But, don't think that you have shaken his faith. The easter bunny still lives! Hallelujah! Praise the cottontail!
Arch, old buddy, we're all ganging up on you. I wish you had an ally.....I mean a real earthly human type one. You are the only one who doesn't see the untenability of your position. Perhaps god will intervene on your behalf. We're waiting........................

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:01 pm

Frank Harrist wrote:I bet she ain't there with cheesy fingers beside you.

She prefers to use her tongue [RIGHT! Stop that!--Ed.]

And for the record Conrad and Melville were both boring as hell.

Infidel!

Doc, I think you have made a very good case which has baffled arch. He hasn't posted anything resembling an appropriate and credible response. But, don't think that you have shaken his faith. The easter bunny still lives! Hallelujah! Praise the cottontail!

Eh . . . perhaps because I am new HERE I have some innocent optimism and patience. I have that vague hope that he will read a reference and educate himself. I have met a lot in his state who have been helped by introduction to science.

Martin Gardner has a wonderful semi-autobiographical book about a boy-preacher who attends the University of Chicago. That place was--and still is--rather infamous for turning the religious into skeptical atheists. The joke is when you ask an alumni how he is, he responds, "relative to what?"

Anyways, Gardner's character, Peter Fromme, confronts his geology teacher with the book The New Geology--an infamous creationist text. The professor appears before his class the next day stating he was given this book and planned to dismiss it. However, he felt it was his duty--as an educator--to explain why it was a worthless load of dingo shit.

Which he spends the rest of the lecture doing.

The character Peter throws the book in the trash after that.

THAT is really the responsibility of scientists and scholars--to be honest and educate. Sure it is "fun" to poke a creduloid and all of that, but . . . heh . . . heh . . .

to quote the wise ToeCutter! If not him someone else. I wager that there are those who "lurk" a board like this or find it looking for "biblical archaeology."

Maybe they will learn something.

--J.D.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:24 pm

I think you have made a very good case which has baffled arch

i am not baffled i am upset that you as a moderator would let posters get so out of control. i noticed it is happening in the religious threads only so so much for your credibility as a moderator.

Arch, old buddy, we're all ganging up on you. I wish you had an ally.

i don't care, all that is being proven is the lack of character everyone has.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:30 am

archaeologist wrote:i am not baffled

Then why has your grammar deteriorated and you have failed to rebut the evidences?

i am upset that you as a moderator would let posters get so out of control.

Most curious since you are the one who is out of control.

i noticed it is happening in the religious threads only so so much for your credibility as a moderator.

Example of grammar deterioration. Try again. Use the links provided to assist you.

i don't care, all that is being proven is the lack of character everyone has.

Allow me to introduce you . . . this is Mr. Kettle:

--J.D.

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:31 am

archaeologist wrote:
I think you have made a very good case which has baffled arch
i am not baffled i am upset that you as a moderator would let posters get so out of control. i noticed it is happening in the religious threads only so so much for your credibility as a moderator.

Arch, old buddy, we're all ganging up on you. I wish you had an ally.
i don't care, all that is being proven is the lack of character everyone has.

Not wise to piss off the moderator, arch. I think they're deviating from the topic waiting for you to answer their questions. Do that and stop whining.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:35 am

Indeed.

--J.D.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:53 am

post like a human being and show some respect then maybe you will get somewhere. until then i will be ignoring all childish posts.

Essan · Post by **Essan** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:35 am

Any chance we can get back to discussing evidence for a global flood that covered every square inch of planet Earth?

Nicole Kidman's okay, but I hardly think she constitutes evidence for the impossible