Noah's Flood...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:16 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Oh great Grasshopper, what riddle are you posing?

Mayhaps comic books are too difficult for this individual?

--J.D.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:18 pm

ed wrote:
Genesis Veracity wrote:Doctor X, magma is about 70% water by weight, hello?
Lets not forget this. A reference if you please?

Hell! He has left his [CENSORED--Ed.] so exposed he is frightening the horses.

1% to 100%, the Earth remains too small to contain that much water by orders of magnitude.

I must confess it is one of the dumbest things I have read since I read a defense of E. E. Cummings [Stop that.--Ed.].

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:19 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Oh great Grasshopper, what riddle are you posing?

OK. Got it. You have no cohesive theory of anything. You are slamming some vaguely scientific stuff together for the sake of verisimilitude and basically selling the bible. That is cool but you should be honest and not make out like it makes sense without resorting to the paranormal.

Definately not Wiley Interscience.

You do realize that you present a real and present danger to the welfare of this country, don't you?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:21 pm

ed wrote:You do realize that you present a real and present danger to the welfare of this country, don't you?

Part of the "Axis of Stupidity" perhaps?

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:25 pm

Doctor X wrote:
ed wrote:You do realize that you present a real and present danger to the welfare of this country, don't you?
Part of the "Axis of Stupidity" perhaps?

--J.D.

I am very serious.

The people that we are going to be in an economic death struggle with over the next decade don't have patience for this kind of crap. They are reality based. The idea that this level of fuzzy thinking should in any way be exposed to our kids is simply dangerous. Can you imagine science "Well, I can't figure it out, Goddidit". Pretty much it would be that tough problems would be abandoned. Swell.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:31 pm

Ed, what is this "real and present danger" of which you speak?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:31 pm

Indeed.

It is all fun and games--like raping a Holocaust Denier--until you realize they actually support genocide. Suddenly it becomes realistic.

I suggested archaeologist read the Collins' address to the Society of Biblical Literature to learn something about religious violence. Such is propagated by willful ignoramii such as this.

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:32 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, what is this "real and present danger" of which you speak?

Energy old son, energy. then we will talk.

The fact that you are avoiding the question tells me you really don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:32 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, what is this "real and present danger" of which you speak?

--J.D.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:33 pm

Doctor X, and who said it's "like raping a Holocaust Denier?"

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:35 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Doctor X, and who said it's "like raping a Holocaust Denier?"

Energy. Talk to us about it. Explain the ramifications.

Just answer the question.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:36 pm

"Real and Present Danger" Ed

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:37 pm

The ramifications of energy? Hmmmm, you first.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:38 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:"Real and Present Danger" Ed

OK. So you are folding? No problem, I too have gotten in over my head and had to back down. Not often but it has happened. You are saying, by your avoidance, that your theory has gaping major holes that you cannot address. Fair?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:38 pm

Ed, if you will understand the GFM, then you can run your own calculations to see if the scenario is falsifiable, have fun.