Noah's Flood...

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

Genesis Veracity wrote:The ramifications of energy? Hmmmm, you first.
You back? Listen, this turning it around does not work. Period. You make the claims, you back them up.
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
Guest

Post by Guest »

If you would cite a supposed hole, then I'll address it.
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, if you will understand the GFM, then you can run your own calculations to see if the scenario is falsifiable, have fun.

:D

OK, you don't have a clue. Got it.
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

ed wrote:
ed wrote:
Genesis Veracity wrote:And besides, since the plates were moving perhaps a hundred feet/minute, they were plunging down deeper under the continental plates, to affect the magnetic field of the earth, the magnetic reversals which are noted in lava rocks, and in sedimentary rocks.

sounds like a worldwide event to me.

How much energy does this generate? How long to stop the plate that are going at 100/ft/min? How much heat would this produce over how long a time? What are the climactic implications for this?
There is more ....

What are the energy implications of the flood water condensing to drops and then hitting the ground? What would happen to the worldwide ambient temperature?
Start here.
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
stan
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by stan »

"Real and Present Danger" Ed
I'm not ed, but I'll agree with him... The real and present danger is that By means of Mr. Veracity's book, ignorance and
stupidity will gain ground. Just what we need! :roll:
The deeper you go, the higher you fly.
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, if you will understand the GFM, then you can run your own calculations to see if the scenario is falsifiable, have fun.
If I thought that you knew anything about science and were engaged in anything other than advocacy "research" I might take you up on that. As it is it is clear to me (and I suspect everyone reading this) that for some odd reason you will lie and distort and mislead to support a mythic structure that you subscribe to. Whether one is dealing with a new age nut, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, a ley line afficianado, a flat earther or a bible literalist or fundimentalist moslem facts are meaningless. They will commit intellectual outrages to advance their beliefs. The fact that you cannot answer a very simple question that follows ineluctably from your contentions suggests that you are simply preaching and that is worth exactly zero.
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
stan
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by stan »


Mr. Veracity,

How did a flood of only 6 weeks pile up thousands of feet of
fossils all over the world? Do you think that that many creatures lived in the ocean at that time?
If all the biomass in the ocean were killed right now, how deep would the pile be?
Answer, please? After all,you wrote the book.
The deeper you go, the higher you fly.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Ed, what do you say I'm lying about?
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

stan wrote:

Mr. Veracity,

How did a flood of only 6 weeks pile up thousands of feet of
fossils all over the world? Do you think that that many creatures lived in the ocean at that time?
If all the biomass in the ocean were killed right now, how deep would the pile be?
Answer, please? After all,you wrote the book.
I'll go a step further, if I may.

Given the putative biomass contained in the putative "flood" deposits, what is the nature and extent of the ecosystem that it implies?

Again, if you are serious, this should be answerable off the cuff.
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
Guest

Post by Guest »

3x the current biomass was entombed in sediments.
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, what do you say I'm lying about?
Answer the questions or fold, please.

Energy
Water mass
magma
ecosystem
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

Genesis Veracity wrote:3x the current biomass was entombed in sediments.
Which implies what?
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
Guest

Post by Guest »

Many things.
ed
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:37 pm

Post by ed »

Genesis Veracity wrote:Many things.
So, what you do is make mony off church ladies? Is that the deal?
"The history of science is the record of dead religions"
Wilde
stan
Posts: 924
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by stan »

Mr. V wrote:
Again, if you are serious, this should be answerable off the cuff.
So why didn't you anwer it?
The deeper you go, the higher you fly.
Locked