Noah's Flood...

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:06 pm

No, that's not "the deal."

stan · Post by **stan** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:09 pm

Who says?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:27 pm

it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:35 pm

Right, fresh caffeine . . . finished beating the members of Staff that "displease me."

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, if you will understand the GFM, then you can run your own calculations to see if the scenario is falsifiable, have fun.

Argumentum ad ignorantiam.

That is right ed! He also has the Unified Theory . . . he just is not going to show it to you.

ed wrote:If I thought that you knew anything about science and were engaged in anything other than advocacy "research" I might take you up on that. As it is it is clear to me (and I suspect everyone reading this) that for some odd reason you will lie and distort and mislead to support a mythic structure that you subscribe to. Whether one is dealing with a new age nut, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist, a ley line afficianado, a flat earther or a bible literalist or fundimentalist moslem facts are meaningless. They will commit intellectual outrages to advance their beliefs. The fact that you cannot answer a very simple question that follows ineluctably from your contentions suggests that you are simply preaching and that is worth exactly zero.

FaaaaaTALITY!

Now about that volume of water. . . .

--J.D.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:36 pm

archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.

We may have to conduct another poll on Official Village Idiot, yes.

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:48 pm

archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.

He's a wackey guy.

Makes me appreciate you. You are loony and your answers can be odd but at least you address the questions is full sentences.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:56 pm

Now if we could only teach him to use "spell check," . . .

We ["We?"--Ed.] have not even begun to scratch the surface of the waters, so to write, of the impossibility of the Genesis Flood Myths. Where are the "waters of the deep" the flat Earth floats on? Where is the firmament that holds back the waters from drowning us?

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:58 pm

didn't he say something about atlantis too?

Man.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:08 pm

ed wrote:didn't he say something about atlantis too?

He . . . reads . . . like . . . He Whose Name Must Not be Written!!!! [!--Ed.]

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:11 pm

Doctor X wrote:
ed wrote:didn't he say something about atlantis too?
He . . . reads . . . like . . . He Whose Name Must Not be Written!!!! [!--Ed.]

--J.D.

Yeah. Thought of that.

Can you imagine if they all got together????????????????????????

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:15 pm

The sudden density of stupidity would cause the universe to collapse into a singularity! The Universe as We Know it [TUAWKI--Ed.] has not been in this much danger since it looked like the Cubs would play the Red Sox for the 2003 World Series.

--J.D.

ed · Post by ed » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:25 pm

Doctor X wrote:The sudden density of stupidity would cause the universe to collapse into a singularity! The Universe as We Know it [TUAWKI--Ed.] has not been in this much danger since it looked like the Cubs would play the Red Sox for the 2003 World Series.

--J.D.

We must work diligently to prevent this from happening.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:39 pm

Well, the Cubs and Red Sox are certainly doing their part. . . .

--J.D.

Post by **Minimalist** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:57 pm

archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.

Kind of makes you two of a kind, no?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:03 pm

Minimalist wrote:
archaeologist wrote:it is so nice to see a new enemy #1. i am not impressed that he cannot back up his statements.

Kind of makes you two of a kind, no?

Not . . . that there is anything wrong with that. . . .

We all want you two to know that we only care that you are happy together.

--J.D.