Book Recommendations.

marduk · Post by **marduk** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:31 pm

you just can't stand the competition? Darwinists are like that.

so are Gods

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:33 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Hey archy, Guest asked for a book which covers 5 or 6 ancient civilizations in one volume, does that sound like that's from someone who is a novice?

Therefore, why don't you let Guest make-up his/her own mind, most people don't need your guidance regarding their judgments about information, or you just can't stand the competition? Darwinists are like that.

The book I mentioned covers a lot of civilizations in a scientifically sound manner. The book you recommend takes Atlantis as a fact, which it is not. You made your recommendation, I made mine.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:51 pm

Hey archy

let's avoid confusion here. i have been known as archaeologist, arch, and archie. i will give up the name 'archie' if all the others agree not to call me that and refer to the new guy.

okay.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:54 pm

Once again, you missed the point, I don't know if you're dense or goofy.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:57 pm

New archy, you're head is so far down a hole, you wouldn't see the evidence 'cause it's so dark down there, you obvioulsy can't be taken seriously, that's what happens when you dodge the issues, makes you look foolish.

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:57 pm

archaeologist wrote:
Hey archy
let's avoid confusion here. i have been known as archaeologist, arch, and archie. i will give up the name 'archie' if all the others agree not to call me that and refer to the new guy.

okay.

I'd like to avoid that confusion too. I'm Jim. OAS - whatever you prefer.

Post by **Minimalist** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:00 pm

archaeologist wrote:
Hey archy
let's avoid confusion here. i have been known as archaeologist, arch, and archie. i will give up the name 'archie' if all the others agree not to call me that and refer to the new guy.

okay.

You are unique, Arch.

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:00 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:New archy, you're head is so far down a hole, you wouldn't see the evidence 'cause it's so dark down there, you obvioulsy can't be taken seriously, that's what happens when you dodge the issues, makes you look foolish.

I've been on this board for a whole 4 hours and made somebody mad at me already. A record.

I'm not seeing any evidence. I'm seeing pseudo science, unsustantiated claims and one mythology being used to prop up another mythology, neither one being based in any verifiable fact. The issue is that your worldview is based on myth and I don't subscribe to those stories. The geologic, fossil and historic records all go against you on this. But I'm sure you will sell a lot of books - von Daniken did. People like this stuff.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:04 pm

Oas, you have no rebuttals, very instructive about you're modus operandi.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:06 pm

I've been on this board for a whole 4 hours and made somebody mad at me already. A record

you have to learn to take g.v. with a grain of salt.

i would like a complimentery copy also, will you send one to korea G.V.?

good books to read: authors--Hoffmeier, McRay, Currid & Kitchen to name a few.

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:09 pm

Genesis Veracity wrote:Oas, you have no rebuttals, very instructive about you're modus operandi.

OK - here's a rebuttal - there is no evidence of 400,000 years of civilization. There is no evidence that the ice age ended 1,500 years ago. There is plenty of evidence that civilization arose with the establishment of agriculture at the end of the last ice age, a period known to geologists as the Holocene, around 10,000 BP.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:09 pm

Sure archae, I'll send you one.

oldarchystudent · Post by **oldarchystudent** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:13 pm

archaeologist wrote:
you have to learn to take g.v. with a grain of salt.

Actually I find him amusing. I can understand where you are coming from, as you base your beliefs on a particular book. I don't agree but I understand it. GV on the other hand seems to have cobbled together a whole range of religion, myths, erroneous data and blended them into a hypothesis. Not sure how, but he did it.

But it is late and I should get to bed. Archy I will look forward to debating you some more.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:18 pm

Aos, you need to learn to read for comprehension, I didn't say the Ice Age ended 1500 years ago, and I didn't say that I think civilization goes back 400,000 years (or 432,000 years), and you have not rebutted any of the evidence which I've presented for the time of the end of the Ice Age, so that's three strikes, yourrrrrrrrrrr out!

Post by **Minimalist** » Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:26 pm

Hoffmeier, McRay, Currid & Kitchen to name a few.

Bible thumping jackasses without a shard of proof among them!