Morning, Cog.Charlie, I think that is a great idea and I will clear the decks to do that. Cool I spent my day today going over the Calico site and giving interactive tours to Anthropology students from LA City College who were also participating in a dig at one of the pits. We traveled off the normal path, up and over one of the small hills while focusing on the identification of surface lithics and patterns. Each group found hundreds of flakes, and a significant amount of knives, scrapers, burins, and a handfull of nice handaxes, etc. It was a helluva lot of fun. At one point, the class Prof. was explaining the head lice significance to one of his students ... it took him about 10-15 minutes.I'd like to get the explanation down to a couple of paragraphs. Meanwhile David Reed et al are progressing with their analysis of pubic lice to determine if the same anomoly arises. In other words, did HSS and HE "hook up"?
![]()
Jim Bischoff also asked Fred Budinger to re-submit material for dating since his tecnique has improved over the last few years. Fred was stunned when I forwarded him Bischoff's results from your site and Texas was brought up twice today. He is incredibly interested in what you are doing and when a paper will be written. More later.![]()
Yeah, I think the evidence of this type lice being in N.A., requiring a human host, adds a another significant element to the mounting body of evidence for man's early existence in N.A. The pubic lice bit is an excellent hypothesis to test. My guess is, yes, Hss and HE probably hooked up somewhere along the line...kinda of like two different species of dogs breeding. I don't think HE vanished suddenly, but probably is incorporated into Hss genes, along with HNs. Your hypothesis certainly seems very worthy of pursuing at a much deeper level. Cool stuff, bro.

Jim Bischoff, from the USGS, and Warren Sharp, from Berkeley's Geochronology Center, have apparently tweaked the U series dating, of carbonate from stone tool artifacts, to a pretty amazing level of accuracy.
Please be sure to tell Fred that Jim is not confident enough of his initial analyses to publish them. He definitely thinks we're onto something, and thus has enlisted the help of Warren Sharp, who is also known to be an expert in this pioneering technique. Warren is currently in the process of reviewing several specimens, from here in Texas, to ascertain their suitability for U series analyses. Crossing my fingers here. The more analyses, performed by independent researchers, that align with one another, the more the certainty of the dating rises. 14C dating of the carbonate is on the "to do" list, also. If we get several greater than 50,000 B.P. dates, then we add to the certainty.
Cool time in history to stumble across some rocks, ey?

Onward through the fog!!