i took a look at the link and the following makes no sense whatsoever:
The second important point in the case for evolution is that some living creatures are very different from some others. This, I take it, is self-evident. Let me cite a common example: many animals have what we call an internal skeletal structure featuring a backbone and skull. We call these animals vertebrates. Most animals do not have these features (we call them invertebrates). The distinction between vertebrates and invertebrates is something no one who cares to look at samples of both can reasonably deny, and, so far as I am aware, no one hostile to evolution has ever denied a fact so apparent to anyone who observes the world for a few moments.
i fail to see his point or what he is talking about and he sounds like he is talking to two year olds not adults.
It is the opposite of science
i will have to disagree with you here because i.d./creation embraces science. you can use any of the sciences to dissect the evidence , get the age, the chemical make-up and so on. science is not left out of i.d./creation it puts it in its proper place, which is a tool and not the final authority.
Science involves looking for the reasons why something happens.
right; but how many times do we hear scientists say, 'we don't know why it happened..." and so on. in evolutionary thinking you do not get to answer why because their is no reason for it unless there is a living God behind it.
we are too stupid to figure this out so it must be "god" who did it
no, we.they are not too stupid to figure it out because we already recognize who did it, much of the guess work is removed. we can still use science to explore this world as we need to understand many things. certainly, the world of science is beneficial even to believers, it just needs to be regenerated, refreshed and re-tooled.