what's your take on the new online encyclopedia?
wiki alternative now online
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
-
ravenwing5910
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:36 pm
- Location: Oregon
- Sam Salmon
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:30 am
- Location: Vancouver-by-the-Sea
It's something a person sees over & over with certain personality types.
Start a great idea, develop it, others climb aboard and soon the originator feels alienated, leaves/is ousted-goes off in a huff to recreate his baby.
The fact is that the type of person who's good at starting things often isn't the type who's good @ running them
EDIT-there's also these loonies-
http://www.conservapedia.com/
Start a great idea, develop it, others climb aboard and soon the originator feels alienated, leaves/is ousted-goes off in a huff to recreate his baby.
The fact is that the type of person who's good at starting things often isn't the type who's good @ running them
EDIT-there's also these loonies-
http://www.conservapedia.com/
-
Minimalist
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 16045
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
- Location: Arizona
"As biases become more prevalent in communally edited encyclopedic websites like Wikipedia.com and the newly formed Conservapedia.com, educators are saying it is more important than ever for students to learn to use credible research tools ...."
One can't argue with that, however.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.
-- George Carlin
-- George Carlin