
According to Robert Bednarik, this art in Chauvet cave in France was created by Neanderthals, or Neanderthaloids. It's exciting that an expert researcher is saying so.

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
Well what we can say for sure is that for a long while robust hominins had larger brains than we do now.Digit wrote:It's ground breaking stuff, soon the Neandertals are going to seen as our mental superiors.
"The now absurd 'African Eve' or replacement model (Stringer and Andrews 1988) was derived from the 'Afro-European sapiens' model (Brauer 1984), which in turn was based on the fake datings of Protsch. Therefore, the now unravelling paradigm was initiated by academic fraud. The replacement model, which demands complete genetic isolation of the invading Africans and the resident robusts, has been refuted, and those models that admit hybridisation between the two hypothetical populations are in reality local versions of the Multiregional Theory that merely claim a strong inflow of African genes (Relethford 2001, Relethford and Jorde 1999)......
...The traditional response, that the Neanderthals could have never been sufficiently advance to produce such masterworks, is simply no longer adequate now that all of the Aurignacian appears to be of 'Neanderthal' tradition.
European Pleistocene archaeologists need to adjust to this new scenario, and unless they can demonstrate that Chauvet was made by what they call 'moderns' or 'Cro-Magnons', they are obliged to fairly consider the possibility that this art is the work of either Neanderthals or of their descendants who experienced genetic drift rather than 'replacement' and whose breeding patterns were influenced by cultural selection: selection in favour of neotenous features. Based on the present archaeological and palaeoanthropological evidence, the latter scenario is the more likely: we have Neanderthal remains from the time of Chauvet, and we have no 'moderns'...."
In an article from 2005 John Hawks had a few words about Protsch.Manystones wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiner_Protsch
Despite what the wiki article says, the Hahnhöfersand Man and Paderborn-Sande Man are significant in the context of supporting evidence for OOA.
Bednarik notes (again from RAR, Vol 24, 1):
"There are now virtually no 'anatomically modern' specimens known from Europe prior to the Gravettian and contemporary traditions ... and even those of the Gravettian are still relatively robust. However, there are numerous Neanderthaloid finds up to the beginning of the Gravettian, around 28,000 years BP."