Human Ancestors Not Swingers

[Beagle]

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/co ... 13/2?rss=1

Humans descended from apes that lived in trees, but researchers have been battling over whether the earliest humans remained agile climbers when they started walking upright on the ground. A new study concludes that early humans may not have been very good at tree-climbing. If correct, the results suggest that our ancestors traded in their arboreal adaptations to become fully human.

From todays news section, new research about how fast we may have evolved to bipedalism. There is a lot of discussion in Anthropology right now about the LCA (last common ancestor), and even heated debate.

That's good. Keep the pot stirring.

[curious01]

I dunno... maybe human ancestors were better at standing on limbs, not grasping with feet?!? I know I was a hell of a branch swinger & walker as a child! I spent half my young life playing Tarzan.

Seriously though, I would hesitantly agree with the view that the concestors were agile tree climbers, albeit using a different locomotion than monkeys & chimps.

[Minimalist]

Some time ago I recall reading a suggestion that the early tree-dwellers were forced to abandon the trees because climate change thinned the forests making it impossible for those tree-dwellers to stay aloft.

There's a certain logic to it if you apply Darwin's idea that a population has to be under stress in order to evolve. Wish I could recall where I saw that.

[kbs2244]

I thought the chain between humans and chimps had been pretty well broken.
Just too many "missing links."

[Digit]

Yeah Min, read the same, I find it dubious unless the tree cover was reduced to that which is familiar today on the African plains as I doubt there were sufficient numbers of our ancestors to need thousands of square miles of forested territory.

Roy.

[Minimalist]

Too long ago for me to remember the details, Dig.

[Beagle]

Some time ago I recall reading a suggestion that the early tree-dwellers were forced to abandon the trees because climate change thinned the forests making it impossible for those tree-dwellers to stay aloft.

There's a certain logic to it if you apply Darwin's idea that a population has to be under stress in order to evolve. Wish I could recall where I saw that.

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/geol ... rview.html

Hawks gives a brief note on the climate change that befell East Africa due to the Great Rift Valley formation millions of years ago. This is the leading theory as to why an ancient ape in East Africa differentiated from it's brothers in the West. But - it's only a theory, even though it's the only one for many years. So I'm sure this is what you read Min.

[Minimalist]

Thanks, Beags. I don't recall the geological stuff so it may have been a commentary written by someone else that focused only on the trees but this certainly lays out the full idea.