Bosnian pyramids, photos

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri May 19, 2006 2:27 pm

as i have said, i can be objective as it deosn't matter to my position or beliefs if this is a pyramid or not.

i do not see any consistancy in the pictures that it is one and if it is then its structure is built differently than other more famous ones.

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri May 19, 2006 2:30 pm

No more than they have flocked to any other place with a pyramid. And tourists would not exchange Egypt for Bosnia because the tourism infrastructure already exists in Egypt...unless the political situation dramatically worsens.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri May 19, 2006 2:34 pm

Speaking for myself, I would rather go to Europe than anywhere in the Middle East or northern Africa. Much less chance of getting my ass blown up.

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri May 19, 2006 2:38 pm

Then the odds are that you wouldn't be going to look at a pyramid, anyway...no matter where it was.

Egypt has lots of temples and other monuments aside from the Giza Plateau for the tourists to check out....as long as the police keep the fanatics at bay.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri May 19, 2006 2:48 pm

No - I am speaking strictly within the context of my former post. A wild imaginative speculation that the Bosnian hill is all that OZ says it is. We all probably think it won't be all that.

stan · Post by **stan** » Fri May 19, 2006 3:26 pm

Their is something odd about the structure from an architectural point of view.
We have seen several different construction methods at the various sites in ciko's photos. There is some kind of congolemerate material, some yellow sandstone, and
some white rectangular "paving stones." Also Barakat asserted that there were some cast blocks...maybe the conglomerate. (Althought the inside of the caves appear to be a natural conglomerate ??) My point is that if the thing were entirely uncovered, it might present a patchwork appearance. Maybe this implies that it was built in stages over centuries.
Or..there might be a grand plan that has not emerged yet.

And how about this: All of them seem to follow the slopes of the hill. Think about it,
the planes of the pyramid going in opposition to each other.
That would seem to be impossible in a natural formation.

Post by **Minimalist** » Fri May 19, 2006 7:26 pm

Some geologists consider this

a natural formation. Others do not.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Fri May 19, 2006 11:02 pm

It looks like the underwater formation off Yonaguni, Japan. That is a very interesting subject in itself. As you know, Schoch thinks that it is a natural formation that was maybe modified and used by man when the structure was above sea level.

I haven't seen a picture of the entire thing before. Cool.

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat May 20, 2006 1:58 am

walls of sun pyramid

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat May 20, 2006 4:47 am

some sort of script found in pyramid area

Tech · Post by **Tech** » Sat May 20, 2006 6:18 am

Sorry Ciko but I think its wishfull thinking to regard that as any sort of script , it looks like natural erosion

Tech · Post by **Tech** » Sat May 20, 2006 6:18 am

Sorry Ciko but I think its wishfull thinking to regard that as any sort of script , it looks like natural erosion

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat May 20, 2006 6:19 am

That don't look like any script I've ever seen. It looks natural. Possibly very badly eroded script, but more like a naturally occuring thing. For what it's worth, Ciko, aside from this script, there does seem to be evidence of something man-made there. Probably not an actual pyramid, though. Probably fortifications from several different eras.

eratoh · Post by **eratoh** » Sat May 20, 2006 6:51 am

might be script, maybe not the script they'd like.

http://x402.putfile.com/4/11607021162.jpg

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat May 20, 2006 7:28 am

Sorry, but I don't see any resemblance.