Bosnian pyramids, photos

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat May 27, 2006 4:32 am

ambasadors from different contries on bosnian pyramid walls

china people

ali barakat

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat May 27, 2006 5:12 am

Ciko wrote:barakat saw those stone blocks wich forms walls of the pyramid but those geologists team from Tuzla University did not

Perhaps they were actually using their HEADS, not their HEARTS!. If you want to be taken seriously, Ciko, stop posting meaningless photos. Those groups above could be ANYBODY.
Fortuneteller,
Thanks for the links. They look pretty interesting, and I hope to get peace to read them later.

Ciko · Post by **Ciko** » Sat May 27, 2006 7:16 am

today

malter · Post by **malter** » Sat May 27, 2006 7:53 am

it is unbelivable that photos of people visiting so called pyramid site are taken as proof. ambassadors visited the place and so what. this is a problem with this project - 90% of news coming out of the project site are about this and that people coming for a visit. 90% of pictures are about somebody visiting the hill. number of visits doesn't make it more likely to find a pyramid. and there is major question - why didn't any world class archaeologist or egyptiologist take the opportunitiy and come to Visoko to at least see the site? Isn't it incredible that Sam couldn't attract any world expert on pyramids to work with him?

GG · Post by GG » Sat May 27, 2006 8:15 am

RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:
Ciko wrote:barakat saw those stone blocks wich forms walls of the pyramid but those geologists team from Tuzla University did not
Perhaps they were actually using their HEADS, not their HEARTS!. If you want to be taken seriously, Ciko, stop posting meaningless photos. Those groups above could be ANYBODY.
Fortuneteller,
Thanks for the links. They look pretty interesting, and I hope to get peace to read them later.

if u r so convinced that those are not pyramids y come in here and discuss it everyday?

Frank Harrist · Post by **Frank Harrist** » Sat May 27, 2006 8:45 am

How old are you, Ciko? You act like a very gullible child. Showing picture after picture of what you want to believe is a pyramid doesn't make it so. You're fantasizing like an 8 year old. Back up your beliefs with some hard facts and stop throwing a childish fit when someone disagrees with you. That doesn't help your case. Your posts no longer mean anything at all and will not be taken seriously. I was on your side at the beginning but you have proven yourself to be an unreliable source for any real information. Stop whining and crying and calling names and give us some hard facts or just shut up.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat May 27, 2006 10:06 am

GG- And why would I be answerable to you, in the first place?

Gerra · Post by **Gerra** » Sat May 27, 2006 11:57 am

malter wrote:it is unbelivable that photos of people visiting so called pyramid site are taken as proof. ambassadors visited the place and so what. this is a problem with this project - 90% of news coming out of the project site are about this and that people coming for a visit. 90% of pictures are about somebody visiting the hill. number of visits doesn't make it more likely to find a pyramid. and there is major question - why didn't any world class archaeologist or egyptiologist take the opportunitiy and come to Visoko to at least see the site? Isn't it incredible that Sam couldn't attract any world expert on pyramids to work with him?

I kind of admire him for the logistical operation he was able to set up , pyramid or not

DougWeller · Post by **DougWeller** » Sat May 27, 2006 12:05 pm

Ciko wrote:
Barakat is a real geologist, even if he didn't find Cambyses' lost army (probably because he confused sand dollar fossils with human fossils). But he isn't one of Egypt's foremost experts on the pyramids, and his quick visit can't be compared with the core drills done by the geological team from Tuzla University, their local knowledge of the geology, and the fact that they are backed by the Bosnian geological society.
barakat saw those stone blocks wich forms walls of the pyramid but those geologists team from Tuzla University did not

Have you read their report?
And so what? Core samples trump looking at stones.

Gerra · Post by **Gerra** » Sat May 27, 2006 1:27 pm

http://www.carlsagan.com/revamp/carlsagan/baloney.html

Perhaps some tools for digging through the debate

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat May 27, 2006 4:15 pm

How old are you, Ciko? You act like a very gullible child.

well said frank. it would be nice to get more information and pictures instead of this cheerleading show. group of men standing on poorly laid concrete, whose quality is a very poor mix, doesn't constitute proof or acceptance of Os' theory.

my own conclusionis that Os is deluding himself and others to get a little fame.

f9 · Post by f9 » Sat May 27, 2006 4:33 pm

First...I dont want ciko to stop posting links and news,even I am against stoping exavations.
Reasons
1.It is in this stage contraproductive and will make another mit about scientific community and we will probably have another area 52 or 53,so this will give food to conspiracy theories~never ending saga....
2.From Archeological point exavations have been caried on the basis that this is more sedimental rock with no value in history,and for these accidental find there are archeologists who are in charge of the exavation proces.From this point I cannot see archeologists to wish to stop striping of the hill for some scientific reason.
3.Geological reports and opinion of Egiptian geologist are in colision in time and in base for conclusions.They are both legitimate and there are must be satisfactory conclusion.
4.Initial piont of movement for exavations is theory based partly on highly advanced scientific methods and partly on pseudoscience .That is
basicaly what this exavations are so important to be finished and result to be published.
Bosnia and Hercegovina and part of Croacia have been sucesfull refuge during last glacial period,from wich place have been repopulated most of the Europe and notably nordic part.Last genetic research have cleared that Dinaric antropological type is geneticaly based on people who have lived in that refuge.This is new for science of antropology mostly because
up to this point have been accepted theory that Dinaric type is complex emerging from mutation of Atlantic with Mediteranian type.
From this point every exavation from Dinaric basin is extremly important,because we know nothing for this refuge and for people there in that time.

Stork · Post by **Stork** » Sat May 27, 2006 10:04 pm

I was just looking through the 'scientific report' posted by Ciko.

In particular, figure 16 seemed interesting because (either my eyes are failing me, or I'm imagining things) there seemed to be some sort of writing inscribed on the slab. Please forgive me if this has already been discussed, or is of no relevance.

Anyway, I decided to play around with the image a little, and think I made out some letters...

If there is something obvious I am completely missing, then please, disregard this post and myself, completely.

Beagle · Post by **Beagle** » Sat May 27, 2006 10:17 pm

Wow, I'm embarrased! I was sure that I saw the word censored.

It's interesting that more discussion hasn't been here about that writing. I actually have no idea whether I'm looking at English characters or not.

Welcome to the forum Stork.

Stork · Post by **Stork** » Sat May 27, 2006 10:26 pm

Beagle wrote:Wow, I'm embarrased! I was sure that I saw the word censored.

It's interesting that more discussion hasn't been here about that writing. I actually have no idea whether I'm looking at English characters or not.

Welcome to the forum Stork.

Thanks for the welcome.

It's hard to say, but some of the 'scribbles' sure do resemble letters from the Latin alphabet, could also be earlier Greek...or some recent graffiti

Archaeologica.org

Bosnian pyramids, photos

reply

Re: reply

reply