Bosnian pyramids, photos

Random older topics of discussion

Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters

Locked
Guest

Post by Guest »

BTW, Arch, do stones have gender where you come from?
not quite sure what you mean there but i focus more on the construction not the rocks themselves as i am not a geologist.
south side of the pyramid has eroded , after so many years it is obvious
not sure how that fits except to provide an excuse for why the hill looks like a hill insteadof a pyramid.
Dr. Hawass is less charitable. He says Mr. Houdin is wrong. Period. "Any Egyptologist cannot accept this," he said. "He imagined this. I don't see his evidence
doesn't that sound like minimalist?/
Cholula pyramid i mexiko
again, if you concentrate on the construction of those real pyramids and then compare what has been found in bosnia, you will see a striking difference. what has been found in bosnia cannot support the weight of the heighth that Os says it is. there is no real foundation in the bosnia dig or none that has been shown in the pictures.

the crime of it all is, that to prove this thing right or wrong, the whole hill will have to be dug up because the adherents aren't going to take 'no' for an answer
Minimalist
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16033
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Arizona

Post by Minimalist »

They don't look as if they have any shortage of hills. They can afford to sacrifice one.
Something is wrong here. War, disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime, corruption, and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This is not good work. If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed.

-- George Carlin
Guest

Post by Guest »

They don't look as if they have any shortage of hills. They can afford to sacrifice one.
korea does it all the time. just saw another one being dug up for the soil.
DougWeller
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:54 am
Contact:

Post by DougWeller »

Minimalist wrote:They don't look as if they have any shortage of hills. They can afford to sacrifice one.
Uhuh
In an excellent article about Pavo Andjelic ( http://www.most.ba/038/092.htm ), published six years ago in the magazine Most, one can find more about his research of the Visoko area: "One of such subjects is the study of the urbanistic structure of the medieval capital of Visoki. Andjelic presents this urban structure through two complex ensambles. The older one is the medieval town of Visoki, on the Visocica hill, consisting of the fortress, the settlement next to it, protected by walls, and another settlement outside the walls, a graveyard and a house of the Bosnian Christians. The other one, the town of Podvisoki, leans on the town of Visoki in the northeast and east hillfoots of Visocica. Podvisoki develops as an open trade center and in time gains its settlement structure."

In a recent interview in the Sarajevo-based daily newspaper Oslobodjenje (May 12, People need a sensation), Mrs. Zilka Kujundzic-Vejzagic , the National Museum archaeologist and opponent of Mr. Osmanagich's theories and activities, expressed a similar view: "As far as I understand, Mr. Osmanagic never got a permit to digg up there, where the medieval town is. But the suburbia, that remained unexplored, will be destroyed. On TV, I saw several of the smaller blocks that were used as building material and is still used in some places. Not the big ones - he says they weigh 40 tons - those are natural formations, and not hand-made under any circumstance. It is probably the remains of some medieval houses."
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Director and Moderator The Hall of Ma'at http://www.thehallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
Guest

reply

Post by Guest »

And no doubt Ciko will insist that guy is "lying" too. Aren't new converts always the most fanatical? :lol:
eratoh
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:06 pm

Post by eratoh »

he's like the energizer bosnian. wheels in here beatin his drum then rolls off through another forum no doubt.
Fortuneteller
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:10 pm

Post by Fortuneteller »

RK Awl-O'Gist wrote:
One thing puzzles me though; when you click on the home page, the Bosnian language version has news reports from the last three days. When you click on the English version, all you get is a news report from January.
Now;
1) Am I doing something wrong?
No, you are not.
2)Can't the translators do something as simple as translate?
Ask Ciko, he is an isider.
3) Isn't the English version posted until it's been doctored for the benefit of the gullible?
I don't know about the English versions, but the Bosnian versions are doctored as well. I will give you an example. This picture was published with an explanation that went like this:
Image
"Prof. Osmanagic thinks that the arrow sign represents a man. Other signs represent the members of his family..."
Prof. Osmanagic is the father of our Os. He is very active in the team and always on his son's side. Prof. Osmanagic is also a university professor. I think, he was teaching at the faculty of mechanical engineering in Sarajevo, maybe civil engineering.
After publishing the first version of the text, the journalist probably realized that Prof. Osmanagic was not the best person to speculate on an ancient writing system, so the text was changed:
"An expert thinks that the arrow..."
Os has fierce opposition in Bosnia. His dig is funded by Bosnia, and the Bosnian opposition can heart him a lot. Whatever you discuss here in this forum has been discussed a month ago in Bosnia. There are also several blogs that only criticize the whole enterprise. However, the quality of the opposition and credible arguments against Os are just not there.
Os won publicity and resources, i.e., money and people who will dig for him. The only problem that he has in the moment is that he cannot mobilize Bosnian scientists. That is just because of his pseudo-scientific reports, doctored articles, and similar things.
It took me no more than a day to find three possible references on the strange shape of the Visocica hill. It might take a week to confirm those references. My point is that it is possible to find very credible references about the topic. It seems that the strange shape of the hill was noticed at least a hundred years ago
Nobody expects Os to find a pyramid. As Doug pointed out, we know of a medieval city and its suburbia on the hill. We know that Romans and Illyrians were there too. However, we don’t know if there is something older than that under the hill. We also don’t know if somebody tried to change the shape of the hill in the last 7000 years. That is why most Bosnian scientists are silent.
It is crystal clear that the area has not been researched and many people want Os to continue digging. Unfortunately, the level of his reports is really, really poor. In addition, Os became very aggressive in the last couple of weeks. The way he speaks is offensive. He says things, such as “Bosnian science belongs to 19th century” and “Bosnian scientists are silent because they are afraid of new theories”. The mainstream is silent because we have not seen lately a single report that looks as a scientific report. I know that there are some independent and credible reports, but Os has decided not to publish them.

I actually did not want to write about Os today. I wanted to ask a question. What is this supposed to be?

Image

More pics
http://pyramidsofbosnia.blogspot.com/
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

The first impression is that of a sandaled left footprint, obviously, but that seems pretty far fetched. :?
Fortuneteller
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:10 pm

Post by Fortuneteller »

...sandaled left footprint...
Is this imprinted into the stone? How could it get there? Please advise!
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

I think it will take someone who is at the site to answer your question Fortuneteller. I think that if the stone were a crudely made concrete - then someone could have stepped into it. Otherwise it seems impossible that it would be a footprint. I can't tell what kind of rock we're looking at.
Fortuneteller
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:10 pm

Post by Fortuneteller »

Beagle wrote:
I think it will take someone who is at the site to answer your question Fortuneteller.
Thank you Beagle! I think I know their answer.

Image

After this, even Atlantis theory looks good.
Guest

Post by Guest »

I wanted to ask a question. What is this supposed to be
i looked at the picture for some time and i wondered if the person who left that was not walking in mud originally? given the indentation next to it, it certainly doesn't look like a natural rock. but ask a geologist as i would like to hear their thoughts on that.
tintin
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:50 pm

heh

Post by tintin »

this is some funny shit.....i can already see a sad ending to this "biggest construction project in the world" (Osmanagic)...:)..I can see upcoming September and the hopes of poor buggers washed away with rain, along with their huge pyramid.. ...and Mr. Sam Osmanagich..of course..he'll be back in Texas enjoting the sun...
Beagle
Posts: 4746
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:39 am
Location: Tennessee

Post by Beagle »

http://koz.vianet.ca/boshis2.htm


Os has said that the pyramid was built by the ancient Illyrians 12,000 years ago. This website posted above says that this civilization was never that old.

I think it gives an overview of the peoples that were there during the neolithic period.
eratoh
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:06 pm

Post by eratoh »

somebody should email ed conrad and see if its his shoe.
Locked