Skeletal remains are very rare. As far as I know nobody has yet to find the remains of a Solutrean yet their tools are everywhere. At least there is what appears to be the remains of a hybrid HSN/HSS child found in Portugal.Agreed on the dates as stated Cogs but, as I argued with RS, finding the first or last of a species must be odds of millions to one against. Later HSN appeard to have buried his dead, thus the chances of finding bones must be even less than if he didn't bury his dead. You posted some time ago on the number of HSN in Europe at a given time, as I obserbed earlier, once numbers fall below a certain level the chances of finding evidence of their existance becomes very small.
My comment made some time ago was that population estimates of the entire HSN population of Eurasia (up to the Altai region) at 45-47kya when HSS began entering the area, was between 8,000 to 15,000 individuals. Finding anything based on the lack of population density would be a flippin miracle and the only reason why we do is because they chose the best spots to hang out since there was no hominid competition at the time, and some of the sites were left undisturbed after they disappeared.
Your position is similar to Bednarik's in that he really doesn't believe that HSS had much of a presence in Europe prior to the LGM. Bednarik references Aurignacian technology as being found with HSN remains, not HSS as everyone was taught and once thought (see: http://donsmaps.com/neandertalsymbols.html). Charlie Hatchett and I would go round and round on this topic with him believing that HSN dunnit while I explored the possibility of many Solutreans being hybrids and they were the ones whodunnit. Alas, neither of us wrote a paper on the topic, nor would anyone be inclined to read it!
