That says it all EP .E.P. Grondine wrote:Hi OA, Geroge -
I understand your reasons for posting very well.
They are pretty damn petty.
George
Moderators: MichelleH, Minimalist, JPeters
That says it all EP .E.P. Grondine wrote:Hi OA, Geroge -
I understand your reasons for posting very well.
They are pretty damn petty.
EPE.P. Grondine wrote:OA, George -
I ask how it can be done, and you tell me
1) I can't do it, when neither of you has ever done it, and further know nothing about how to do it
2) I am going to screw it up.
3) I am a vandal for insisting on doing it myself, when I've explained to you multiple times why I have to do it myself - hypothetically.
Now not only did you two not send any money along with those gems, there were no Harry and David's gift packs in the mail.
By the way, the price of "Man and Impact in the Americas" is now $35 plus postage.
Tiompan wrote: EP
There is only [one] thing that matters here and that is the artefact . As long as it remains undamaged whether recorded or not , then everything is fine
George
E.P. Grondine wrote:Tiompan wrote: EP
There is only [one] thing that matters here and that is the artefact . As long as it remains undamaged whether recorded or not , then everything is fine
George
That's not much of an apology, George.
I've told you before that the artifact's caretaker would not allow me to do anything which might possibly damage it.
And once again you provided exactly zero information on how to do make an impression without damaging the artifact. Pretty Useless.
Now I've already told you that some of the world's experts in making impressions work about 2 hours from where I am now.
As far as damaging artifacts goes, have you seen how OHS runs the sites under its control?
Have you watched OHS take artifacts away from where the areas they were found and move them to Columbus?
George, your continued insistence that I am going to damage aforementioned hypothetical artifact is g*d d***n f**k***g insulting, and pretty much says it all.Tiompan wrote:EP , You seem to have a major problem understanding simple text and continually evade the issue with non sequitors .
Hardly surprising that your response should be based on illogical fabricated nonsense and not a word about potential harm to the artefact .
Not that it matters but where did I say anything about property rights , what field I worked in , even whether it was archaeological or in North Anerica .
All an obvious smoke screen to avoid facing up to the real question .
George
They are not "theories", it is a hypothesis, and testable by the evidence. The Holocene Start Impacts have passed, though you are entirely ignorant of that, at least right now.dannan14 wrote: Well, EP, i didn't think anyone could do it, but you're actually making me start to miss RS. For a time, your fanatical adherence to your theories was very amusing, but now you seem to have abandoned all reason.
I asked how to make an impression. What I got was assertions that I could not do it, could not learn how to do it, and further will damage the hypothetical artifact, all from people who have demonstrated absolutely no knowledge of how to do it.dannan14 wrote: You asked a real question, yet when you got real answers you responded with an unscrupulous level of evasiveness and ad hominems.
Well now, danaan, I hypothetically located the hypothetical artifact, have its caretaker's trust, and know some specialists in the First Nations' glyph systems. As no others have that, the responsibility thus falls to me.dannan14 wrote: i starting to think you're simply a highly skilled yet patient troll. When you arrived here you were simply on the fringe...something that many folks on this board can appreciate. However, in this thread your behavior compares unfavorably with the Club. For reasons which you have not made clear, you apparently believe that you and only you can accomplish this task.
For the umpteenth time, I asked how to make an impression. What I got was assertions that I could not do it, could not learn how to do it, and further will damage the hypothetical artifact, all comments from people who have demonstrated absolutely no knowledge of how to do it.dannan14 wrote: Even worse, you are dismissing all rational advice as if it were a personal attack against you.
Well, you're s**t out of luck, danaan.dannan14 wrote: i, for one, hope that the artifact in question, if it actually exists, is kept far from you and your insistence on using potentially damaging methods when reasonable alternatives have been put forth.
Actually, I rely upon it.Tiompan wrote: EP ,You seem to forget that anyone can read this and simply go back over the previous posts .
George, you seem to forget that anyone can read this and simply go back over the previous posts .Tiompan wrote: Maybe you can can actually provide quotes where I have "made stuff up " or started using ad hominems .
Another Christmas present to myself: I am not going to use aggravation to produce insulin.Tiompan wrote: Your examples are clear to see.
George, you have no idea of the standards of practice I hold myself to, and you have shown no idea of how to make an impression as well.Tiompan wrote: It is the concern of anyone who has an interest in ensuring no damage comes to artefacts to respond to potential irresponsible actions .
George, think of it as a personal invitation from me to make yourself a fool, but this time in a way that will last not only for the rest of your life, but for hundreds of years afterwards.Tiompan wrote: Holocene impact events are yet another non sequitor .
George