Kalopin wrote:
E.P.,
O.K., calm down, you all will be all right. With all due respect- This is just a forum. A place to voice ideas and opinions. you are free to leave the conversation at any time. If this 'irritates', then why give it recognition?
Are you an 'us' or a 'we'? No, unless your coward buddies speak up, you are an 'I' [delusional much]?
And no, I am fine with my version of physics. It is from the future. You all will eventually catch up!
Someone needs to help with 'impact studies' as there is very little if any cooperation and even less understanding of the processes concerning habitable planet impacts, in which topography changes rapidly.
So you have an impact study more important than this? What is it? I am very interested to hear of a more important find than an 1811 Mississippi embayment impact.
I would have to say 'ditto' on the irritation. Your investigative knowledge skills lack mostly knowledge and investigation!
All you need to do is draw the line from the New Madrid bend to North Slayden, Ms. It is simple and it is obvious. There are many to already undestand this to be fact. The topography will never lie [unlike?
]
Here it is: If you do not have honesty, intelligence, integrity, a passion for the truth and the investigative skills, then you do not belong on this thread. You do not even need to communicate with me at all. You are not anyone I would wish to speak with. You are a liar, ignorant, selfish thief. If you are on the l.i.s.t. then you have no part in the advancement of science and your voice and opinions are null and void due to your incompetence. No one is wasting anyone's time. I do not have to read or participate any more than you do. If you must have so little respect voicing such condensention, then you should have the cojones to admit where all the attitude is coming from.
So, you gonna' let me know who all is behind your rhetoric? Fear is one of the big reasons that this is not already common knowledge.
I really think that it is so funny how this has been so misunderstood by so many, as so many others have no problem. It appears that only the ones who have been studying the topography of the embayment and the New Madrid fault system are having such a problem with acceptance. Continuing to postulate: 'no it ain't'! With no evidence to back up their beliefs, while I put all the evidence needed to give credit to the only scenario with merit, an impact event.
You are the ones wasting my time. Unless there is something to help give verification in either way, right or wrong, then it would be fine to let it go, at least until the rocks find study and more research has been done. Thanks for your time, advice and all the fun flattery. I'll get back with you!
"I said 'good day!'"
Kalopin,
I am calm, and I am now calmly going to gut you.
I am a lying, ignorant, and selfish thief?
You may want to take a good look in the mirror, kalopin.
As far as my "coward" buddies go, you will have absolutely no luck wasting their time.
I have spoken before with people who see things that are not there.
(Sometimes that has been after they have been "experimenting" with extremely powerful hallucinogens.)
It just took me a while to understand that you were one of them.
As far as my biases go, you need to understand that I view re-incarnation religions as evil, and that includes the modern theosophist new-age variants and much their own peculiar "psuedo-physics". I am excellent reasons for taking this stand; the sheer number of people killed by these beliefs forced me to it.
It was all very funny until the bodies started piling up. Then it suddenly becomes tough to keep your sense of humor, or a jounalist's perspecitve. By the way, while journalists are pretty jaded, and not much surprises or throws them, there are some things that can shake them. But then, why spoil a good story by giving away its end?
To sum up, kalopin, there are plently of stupid people around, and plenty of conmen who gladly steal from them by telling them they are right. All I will say is that you are very, very "special", kalopin. In other words, just another one of their lumpen prole victims.
While I have actually tried to avoid commenting on this particular psuedo-physics, I find myself forced to confront it.
Congatulations. Here is what you demand:
Not only does the "Electric Univeerse" model confuse impact studies, it actually is impeding work on space plasma flows as well. As Leroy Ellenberger has pointed out, the EU mdoel rests on fundamenal claims about our Sun that are demonstratably false.
But instead of confonrting those demonstrations we get a large amount of garbage and obfuscating verbiage.
That is why your argument is so unclear, kalopn, and no one here can follow it; it is based on demonstratably false physics, and no one here is that stupid.
You can sling any words you want, kalopin, abot hwo close minded we are, but you have to remembe that everyone here is very open minded, having been "heretics" supporting pre-Clovis, and now very early migration out of Africa and very early marine technologies. And we have spent hours calmly discussing amongst ourselves the finer points of our heresies, and the factual basis for them, without using insults (well, okay, very mild ones).
Do not demand that I waste my time repeating Lerop's demonstration here; Leroy Ellenberger has already done it, and you and anoyne else can read his demonstration. If you want to argue it with him, please do, he will enjoy doing it.
To get down to your specific claims in this case:
First, you have not demonstrated any plasma phenomenon related to the Comet of 1811.
Second, you have not demonstrated any impact process.
What you imagine an impact to be, and what one is, are very different.
You are not the first peron of the EU school to puruse me on a forum.
And I have been pursued by other obsessive compulsives for years.
As far as my current work goes, it is easy enough to find it.
Who could argue such level of intelligence 
