Bosnian pyramids, photos

[Katherine Reece]

I didn't see a new thread on the list ...

[Minimalist]

It's called "Giza."

[f9]

Latest is that archeologist have visited Visocica hill and have confirmed on the Press conference that Exavations are on geological formations without any cultural importance.
Mr Sam Os is not a disturbing and damaging cultural monuments from rich cultural heretige of Bosnia-that means that blatant attack from European archeology associacion have been baseless.
This is good outcome for Pyramid lovers and diggers and time-space to prove their theories.

[Yamemaru]

i just want those experts to show up already, either Osmangic is a pure genuis or he is the biggest hoaxer of the decade.

Im on the fence right now, I dont know what to bealive. I will wait for time to continue ticking and soon it will tell what is going on, but what I really wana see is what Osmangic will do if they do confirm that this is no Pyramid.

[Yamemaru]

Welcome to the mother Load













I bealive this is a skeleton found on it somewhere


some blocks here

whats this look like?
I dont have captions cos idk whats going on, but pictures are worth 1k words fools.

[Fortuneteller]

I read the full version of the Tuzla report, and I will try to describe the document. Please note that I am not a geologist, and that my review of the document does not have to be accurate. However, it is probably enough that you get an idea about the content.

The geologists from Tuzla read the report provided by Osmanagich’s geologists, primarily geologist Nadja Nukic. Here is the link (Osmanagich’s site):http://www.piramidasunca.ba/eng/podmeni ... kt2005.doc

Please note that the report is not complete. If you look at the table of contents, you may notices that appendices are missing. At least they were missing tonight, June 11, 2006.

The Tuzla geologist had a document similar to this one but in Bosnian. However, I don’t know which version of the document that they read. The Bosnian and English versions are not identical. Here is the link on the Bosnian version.

The second report that relevant for the Tuzla document is written by Osmanagich and contains “scientific proofs” about existence of the “Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun; Discovery of the First European Pyramid”. Here is the link:
http://www.alternativnahistorija.com/AH8.htm

I tried to translate only one part of the document that describes discrepancies between the geological reports provided by Osmanagich’s geologists and Osmanagich’s book, and here is my “naïve” translation.

After described geological research Mr. Semir Osmanagich wrote a book “Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun”. In this book the author made us know that the results of the geological research were not used as a basis for making conclusions about the “pyramid”. Herein we will list several proofs:
1. On page 150 of his book, Mr. Osmangich describes profile of the well B-1 and points out: “At a depth of depth 3.7m, clay changes into marlstone, which is geologically impossible, because of a very short period (“it cannot happen in 20,000 years”).
Geologist Nadja Nukic in her report had not recorded this data as anomalies. On profile B-1 at a depth of 3.7m clay changes into clay marlstone, which is entirely natural.
2. On page 159 Mr. Osmanagich wrote: “At a depth of 4.7m (B-1), a “brown stone”, which would become the main mystery of these probings, is found for the first time.
Geologist Nadja Nukic did not see that as an anomaly. On the profile of the well B-1 at 4.50-5.85m, she noticed clay iron carbonate sandstone.

3. On page 151, Mr. Osmanagich explained: “There is a very important anomaly at 7.80m: marlstone, gravel and traces of black (organic material)”
Geologist Nukic commented that there are “clay, marlstone, and coal with gravel and sand”, but she emphasized that some material falling from the walls of the well could occur.

4. On page 153, Mr. Osmanagich wrote: “at a depth of 9.90 to 10.20m (B-1) there is a layer of “decorative stone” with traces of iron (?)”
This has not been considered an anomaly by geologist Nukic. On the profile in the interval from 9.90-10.20m, she separated breccia conglomerate.

There were 9 examples of discrepancies described. The second part of the Tuzla report described the probing that their team performed at the site. They confirmed “determination of sediments” given by geologists Nukic and Kovacevic. However, they concluded that “anomalies” that are described in Osmanagich’s book do not exist.

As you know, in their final conclusion they wrote that, in their opinion, the hill is a natural formation.

I repeat, I am not a geologist and this translation does not have to be accurate. However, the team from Tuzla did state that “the proofs” provided by Osmanagich are not based on the geological reports.

The document was downloaded from the Internet. Is it possible to get a copy directly from the faculty in Tuzla? In that case we would know that we have a real reference here. That would be my first step. Could somebody ask for a copy? Katherine? Doug?

The faculty may even decide to provide a professional translation. There is nothing to lose if we ask. At worst they can say “no”. We still have our “cyberspace” copy.

It is also very important to give a fair opportunity to Osmanagich’s team to prepare their reports and challenge the Tuzla report. Osmanagich promised the scientific reports by the end of June. Remember?

[Fortuneteller]

Yamemaru, thank for the posting the pics. I was wandering where this picture disappear. That is more than a skeleton. That’s a mummy. Osmanagich's archeologist was talking about "poorly preserved" skeleton only. That is not a poorly preserved skeleton. Where is the unlucky guy now?

[Katherine Reece]

It's called "Giza."

LOL! Thanks ... I thought you meant y'all had started a new thread on the Bosnian site

[Yamemaru]

Yamemaru, thank for the posting the pics. I was wandering where this picture disappear. That is more than a skeleton. That’s a mummy. Osmanagich's archeologist was talking about "poorly preserved" skeleton only. That is not a poorly preserved skeleton. Where is the unlucky guy now?

hes in UK for further testing.

By the way the report from Tuzla is contradicting Osmangic?

[Yamemaru]

some new pics

[Minimalist]

It's called "Giza."

LOL! Thanks ... I thought you meant y'all had started a new thread on the Bosnian site

I don't trust them that much, Kate.

[Yamemaru]

It's called "Giza."

LOL! Thanks ... I thought you meant y'all had started a new thread on the Bosnian site

I don't trust them that much, Kate.

whats this suppose to be an insult to bosnian people? sounds a little off.

[Guest]

there is nothing in those pictures that provide any consistancey in construction of a pyramid. i would like to hear fromthe resident geologists concerning their opinion about those pictures but from a construction viewpoint, there is nothing there.

even the worst builder of modern times would hesitate to put their name to such slipshod work (if it is man made stuff being shown).

i fear that the hill and its treasures are lost because some lunatic wants to change history and make a name for himself.

[Minimalist]

It's a mild dig at Bosnian pyramidologists....but, hey, at least I'm willing to wait until you finish digging before deciding if it is or isn't.

[Beagle]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060610/ap_ ... ontroversy

In todays news, a British archaeologist weighs in - disagrees with Egyptian geologist.