Archaeologica.org

Ed, it wasn't faulty understanding, as proven with my other posts stating magma, that is a very thin and goofy straw you're clinging to, I'm pleased to see you're at that level of attempted rebuttal.

Genesis Veracity wrote:Ed, it wasn't faulty understanding, as proven with my other posts stating magma, that is a very thin and goofy straw you're clinging to, I'm pleased to see you're at that level of attempted rebuttal.

Any reference that magma is 70% water? Yes or no.

Any quantification of the energy ramifications of your theory?

Any data to show that dendrochronology is error fraught?

I have no indication that you know the mechanics of the GFM, if you did, you probably wouldn't have these concerns.

By the way, you can know that dendochronology on very old trees is faulty because current periods of growth per year are not what they were during the Ice Age, which ended circa 1500 B.C.

But it is your job, X, to write that long awaited book about how there is no water in magma, it'll be a big hit, go for it.

Anyone else not clear on the "water content" of magma?

you were claiming X that there is no water in Magma
http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/geol204 ... &magma.htm

The composition of the gases in magma are:

Mostly H2O (water vapor) & some CO2 (carbon dioxide)

you were wrong

Genesis Veracity was claiming iirc that Magma was 70% water
he was wrong

this is what Essan claimed
he was right
it is what I am claiming
I am right


are we clear now ?

Wrong Marduk, 70% by weight (in magma, under pressure, below).

I'm sure Marduk would be happy to buy the second copy (I get the first) of your forthcoming release "No Water Below."

X, here's a word picture which should actually help you. You know those clips of lava flows with huge volumes of steam coming from them? That is water vapor, and no, the natives didn't pour water on the lava flow for that effect.

(And please X, no references to vapors coming off bi-products, please.)