Page 2 of 3
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:46 pm
by marduk
As for the Horse? Not reading Greek what is the original word, and even if it is 'horse', would they have meant what today is meant by the word.
hmmm
you haven't read the Iliad have you Digit

you should read Virgil's Aeneid as well to get your answer
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:50 pm
by Digit
Just which Uni did you take your degree in mind reading at Steve?
I have read it, but in English, which leaves my question unanswered.
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:57 pm
by Minimalist
Takes a great deal of diligence to look for written records of what was going on in the M/E or Asia Minor at the end of the Bronze Age.
I recalled reading in Finkelstein's discussion of the Sea Peoples that there had been a letter found giving warning of their approach but it took a hell of long time to find it.
A Sea People appear in another set of records dated around the early 12th century BC. Ammurapi, the last king of Ugarit (c.1191 BC - 1182 BC) received a letter from the Hittite king Suppliluliuma II warning him about the "Shikalayu who live on boats" who are perhaps the same people as the Shekelesh mentioned in Merneptah's list. It may be relevant that shortly after he received this communication, Ammurapi was overthrown and the city of Ugarit sacked, never to be inhabited again.
http://www.crystalinks.com/egyptindiandena.html
Troy VIIA, the alleged Troy of the Trojan War, has a destruction dated to 1190 or so, which would be a hell of a coincidence but it is always possible one supposes. Meanwhile, Mycenae itself was also destroyed around 1100 BC. Meanwhile Tiryns and Pylos also went down, apparently earlier according to Blegen, which indicates that there was a prolonged period of fighting between the Mycenaeans and someone. Does it seem highly likely that the Greeks would have been involved in a war with Troy when their own homes were under attack?
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:59 pm
by marduk
Just which Uni did you take your degree in mind reading at Steve?
I have read it, but in English, which leaves my question unanswered
well your memory is faulty then
What a thing was this, too, which that mighty man [Odysseus] wrought and endured in the carven horse, wherein all we chiefs of the Argives were sitting, bearing to the Trojans death and fate!
But come now, change thy theme, and sing of the building of the horse of wood, which Epeius made with Athena's help, the horse which once Odysseus led up into the citadel as a thing of guile, [495] when he had filled it with the men who sacked Ilios. If thou dost indeed tell me this tale aright, I will declare to all mankind that the god has of a ready heart granted thee the gift of divine song.” So he spoke, and the minstrel, moved by the god, began, and let his song be heard, [500] taking up the tale where the Argives had embarked on their benched ships and were sailing away, after casting fire on their huts, while those others led by glorious Odysseus were now sitting in the place of assembly of the Trojans, hidden in the horse; for the Trojans had themselves dragged it to the citadel. [505] So there it stood, while the people talked long as they sat about it, and could form no resolve. Nay, in three ways did counsel find favour in their minds: either to cleave the hollow timber with the pitiless bronze, or to drag it to the height and cast it down the rocks, or to let it stand as a great offering to propitiate the gods, [510] even as in the end it was to be brought to pass; for it was their fate to perish when their city should enclose the great horse of wood, wherein were sitting all the best of the Argives, bearing to the Trojans death and fate. And he sang how the sons of the Achaeans [515] poured forth from the horse and, leaving their hollow ambush, sacked the city.
and in Virgils Aeneid
By destiny compell'd, and in despair,
The Greeks grew weary of the tedious war,
And by Minerva's aid a fabric rear'd,
Which like a steed of monstrous height appear'd:
The sides were plank'd with pine; they feign'd it made
For their return, and this the vow they paid..
Thus they pretend, but in the hollow side
Selected numbers of their soldiers hide:
With inward arms the dire machine they load,
And iron bowels stuff the dark abode.
Laocoon, follow'd by a num'rous crowd,
Ran from the fort, and cried, from far, aloud:
‘O wretched countrymen! What fury reigns?
What more than madness has possess'd your brains?
Think you the Grecians from your coasts are gone?
And are Ulysses' arts no better known?
This hollow fabric either must inclose,
Within its blind recess, our secret foes;
Or 't is an engine rais'd above the town,
T' o'erlook the walls, and then to batter down.
Somewhat is sure design'd, by fraud or force:
Trust not their presents, nor admit the horse.’
its quite clear that this isn't a mistranslation
mind you Zechariah Sitchin claims that the Horse of Troy was an alien armoured personnel carrier which battered down the gates of troy
so by comparison your attempt at redaction is most admirable

Sea Peoples
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:02 pm
by Cognito
I think it more likely that "Troy" or whatever it was called was done in by The Sea Peoples. The timing is about right.
Now, there is a significant school of thought that holds that the Sea Peoples were Greek, at least in part. So...what better way to make your ancestors appear to be less of a bunch of barbarians than to declare them "heroes?"
Sorry ... the Sea Peoples were not Greek, although there were Greeks among them. There were a variety of cultures that made up the Sea Peoples, but the Greeks were not predominant (yes, I'm being redundant to make a point).

Does anyone here other than Marduk know who orchestrated the Sea Peoples' invasions?
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:05 pm
by marduk
Does anyone here other than Marduk know who orchestrated the Sea Peoples' invasions?
oh nuts

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:06 pm
by Digit
Facinating Steve! Take a look at the historical uses of the word 'Horse'.
Nearly all traditionl 'crafts' use a horse, and having read what you posted(twice) I see no reference to Equine similarities. Indeed it has been suggested in the past that the 'horse' was a siege engine, hardly horse like.
Re: Sea Peoples
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:12 pm
by Minimalist
Cognito wrote:I think it more likely that "Troy" or whatever it was called was done in by The Sea Peoples. The timing is about right.
Now, there is a significant school of thought that holds that the Sea Peoples were Greek, at least in part. So...what better way to make your ancestors appear to be less of a bunch of barbarians than to declare them "heroes?"
Sorry ... the Sea Peoples were not Greek, although there were Greeks among them. There were a variety of cultures that made up the Sea Peoples, but the Greeks were not predominant (yes, I'm being redundant to make a point).

Does anyone here other than Marduk know who orchestrated the Sea Peoples' invasions?
The Philistines (Peleset to the Egyptians) seem to have convinced people that they were indeed Greek....if not Mycenaean themselves.
http://oi.uchicago.edu/research/pubs/nn/spr95_ash.html
The Philistines conquered Canaanite Ashkelon in ca. 1175 B.C., and throughout the Philistine period Ashkelon flourished as one of the five cities of the Philistine pentapolis and as the main Philistine seaport. Originally of Greek Mycenaean origin, the Philistines, along with other "Sea Peoples," swept across the lands of the eastern Mediterranean shortly after 1200 B.C., displacing the previous inhabitants and carving out their own territory in southern Palestine. We know that they came from the Aegean area because their pottery is closely related to Mycenaean pottery produced during the Late Bronze Age in mainland Greece and the Greek islands. During the earliest period of their occupation of Palestine, the Philistines used local clays to produce a monochrome pottery, decorated with either red or black paint, that is very similar to the Mycenaean pottery of the Aegean. Later they produced a hybrid, bichrome pottery painted in both red and black that contains both Mycenaean and Canaanite stylistic features. This is what has usually been called "Philistine" pottery, but it really represents the second generation of Philistine habitation in the region. In the small area in which the earliest Philistine occupation of Ashkelon has so far been uncovered, the pottery sequence from monochrome to bichrome has been well demonstrated, giving a vivid picture of the arrival of a new group with foreign antecedents and their gradual acculturation to the styles and techniques found in their new home.
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:18 pm
by marduk
yup
well clearly in that case you don't understand the history behind the story do you
or why a wooden horse was a fitting gift
were you perhaps thinking a horse was a very odd gift to give trojans when socks and aftershave usually make you happy
well apart fromt he fact that a squad of soldiers can't hide in socks and aftershave (unless the socks are very big and the aftershave bottle very empty)
go google "the hippoi troiades" and you'll see why it was relevant

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:28 pm
by Barracuda
The Sea People were many very diverse tribes. No one knows why they chose to unit and invade from the Mediterranean when they did.
Some speculate they may have been displaced by an volcanic eruption on Santorini, but the timing is not quite right. The invasions was a couple hundred years after the eruption, but perhaps the geologic dating was off, or perhaps the effects of the eruption lasted that long and it took the survivors a few generations to unite and move on?
But I don't think it was Sea People who invaded Troy. My guess it is trading powers from the western side of the Aegean. Looking at east to west trade routes, Troy would get the first shot at anything coming from the east by land or sea.
The treasures found by the German treasure hunter, whose name I forget, were much later than the period in question, but do go to show that the region of Troy was very, very rich at a later date. It probably was at the time of the Trojan War, too.
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:39 pm
by Digit
So the 12 horses of Troy? So it is relevant to a story, but hardly seems factual when you consider the size and structural problems involved in its building and movement into the city.
Sounds much more like a poetical idea grafted onto something that might have happened.
In addition I would want to see the context in which the original word(s) were used.
After all, the King James Bible says 'though shalt not kill', the original doesn't, but the error, along with Peter/Petra, has been sustained for a long time as well.
So original context please?
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:40 pm
by marduk
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:44 pm
by Digit
Sorry Steve, my computer skills are letting me down, you'll have to help on that.
Sea Peoples
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:03 pm
by Cognito
The Philistines (Peleset to the Egyptians) seem to have convinced people that they were indeed Greek....if not Mycenaean themselves.
The Peleset definitely had Mycenaeans among them. Grave goods in the Philistine area attest to that fact.

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 3:06 pm
by Minimalist
The treasures found by the German treasure hunter, whose name I forget,
Heinrich Schliemann? Priam's Treasure?
As I recall, Priam's Treasure actually dates from several hundred years prior to Troy VII. Troy II. I'd have to go look it up.