Re: Neandertal wrap up
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:59 am
And when the definition becomes viable.


Your source on the web for daily archaeology news!
https://archaeologica.org/forum/
That would exclude me of course.Digit wrote:Only if we agree on the meaning of 'human' gentlemen.
Not just across that very long time axis, but regionally distributed as well. And probably re-hybridized a couple times with other waves of, other varieties of, HE.Minimalist wrote:There were significant changes from early HE to late HE over the course of that very long time.
Absolutely! After all, he's our granddad!HE did most of the heavy lifting in an evolutionary sense. Perhaps that alone qualifies them for the title of Champ?
The Abos, Papua, and Bushmen are living examples, imo.How much evolving have HNS and HSS shown from early to late? Maybe the time will come when HSS is regarded as the natural outflow of HE with HNS being merely a group of the same which was isolated by climate and distance from the main highway of development?
The Abos, Papua, and Bushmen are living examples, imo.
That just depends on the 'severity' of that isolation. Have you been to the Greek or British isles...? Everybody knows the "English Rose" type woman. That's not a recognizable type for nothing. Etc. etc.Minimalist wrote:And probably, so are we. Just not as isolated and inbred.The Abos, Papua, and Bushmen are living examples, imo.
Asian Neanderthals, Humans Mated
A modern human fossil dating to more than 100,000 years ago in Asia reveals distinctive Neanderthal features.
The discovery of early modern human fossil remains in the Zhirendong (Zhiren Cave) in south China that are at least 100,000 years old provides the earliest evidence for the emergence of modern humans in eastern Asia, at least 60,000 years older than the previously known modern humans in the region.
“These fossils are helping to redefine our perceptions of modern human emergence in eastern Eurasia, and across the Old World more generally,” says Eric Trinkaus, PhD, the Mary Tileston Hemenway Professor in Arts & Sciences and professor of physical anthropology.
The Zhirendong fossils have a mixture of modern and archaic features that contrasts with earlier modern humans in east Africa and southwest Asia, indicating some degree of human population continuity in Asia with the emergence of modern humans.
It IS more logical to assume they did and that we simply haven't YET found any evidence (sea levels and all that) IN the Americas than to assume they "doubled back" to go to Europe, imo. And the evidence IS that they WERE in east Asia BEFORE they were in Europe!Digit wrote:Which automatically leads to the question, did they 'go east young man', to the Americas?
How do you figure that?It also opens a can of worms for the Aboriginies perhaps.
That should be demoted to having been just ONE of many waves obviously.One also has to ask what happened to the OOA 70000 yrs ago idea?
Code: Select all
How do you figure that?
Agree. Their relative 'HE content' may vary but I bet they are hybrids. As the Papua and the Bushmen are, imo.Digit wrote:Comparative anatomy. If they aren't more HE than late HSS I'll eat my hat.How do you figure that?