Page 2 of 5

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:21 pm
by Digit
Tell me Uni, don't the objections raised by myself and others to the OP cause you to stop and think, or do you simply ignore these obvious difficulties?

Roy.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:42 pm
by uniface
The "OP" being . . . (?)

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:48 pm
by Rokcet Scientist
uniface wrote:...in their milleau is...
Excuse me?
What is that?

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:44 am
by Digit
The "OP" being . . . (?)
Original Post, ie River Journal?

Roy.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:56 am
by uniface
So where is all the plutonium and uranium in India if there was a nuclear war just a few thousand years ago?
If you'd ask that about Hiroshima or Nagasaki, people would laugh you out of the room.
Had there been a nuclear war only 11kya the evidence would be all over the affected area. There would be a layer with such fallout throughout much of the world. It isn't there.
This after having spent so much time on the 'thermonuclear event" that abruptly ended the pleistocene ?

:roll:

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:05 am
by Digit
Ye Gods! And my questions ignored again, I wonder why that is?

Roy.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:15 am
by uniface
Ye Gods! And my questions ignored again, I wonder why that is?
They've been addressed. You're ignoring them -- or they're incomprehensible to you (?)
Out of curiosity where would I find these books in my local libary, under fiction or non-fiction! :roll:
What's the medical term for someone like you who has a chronic need to piss all over other people's posts? Are you in the running to redefine misery on two legs?
Sam Salmon
Mar. 12. 2006

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:25 am
by Digit
They've been addressed. You're ignoring them -- or they're incomprehensible to you (?)
They must be, try again, where are the mines, the chemical plants etc etc etc.
I haven't seen any straight answers to any of those.
What's the medical term for someone like you who has a chronic need to piss all over other people's posts
Logician?

So asking some logical questions about the necessary infra structure to create a nuclear weapon is pissing all over your posts is it? So what's the medical term for someone who ducks all awkward questions?
The fact that you can't show any of the infrastructure obviously doesn't count.

Roy.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:37 am
by uniface
Try finding any trace of the mills that produced the world's steel just 100 years ago.

Assinine question, IMHO.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:45 am
by Digit
And the same applies to the mines? To residual Radio Activity at production sites? What did the bomb do, blow up its creators so that their civilisation vanished, if so what happened to the intended victims?
Covenient that all the evidence seems to be in your mind don't you think?

Roy.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:52 am
by Minimalist
Digit wrote:Ye Gods! And my questions ignored again, I wonder why that is?

Roy.

They were inconvenient.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:54 am
by Digit
:lol: :lol:
I must get another hobby!

Roy.

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:37 pm
by Rokcet Scientist
(Incorrectly) ascribed to P.T. Barnum and paraphrased: "There's an Arch born every minute".

:lol:

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:48 am
by uniface
And you would propose what scenario to plausibly account for the extraordinary levels of radiation found and measured there ?

And for the uncanny correspondence of the purportedly "mythological" memories with the subsequently discovered evidence congruent with them ? Monkeys and typewriters maybe ?

If so, I've my own candidates for the monkeys involved in this. :lol:

Re: The Big Bangs

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:05 am
by Digit
I would, but I doubt that you would be even remotely interested in a natural explanation.
Just how 'extraordinary' are the radiation levels, what are the plant, animal and human birth deformities like? What type of radiation are we referring to? What is the geology like? What is the background radiation level? And where again are the mines, the surviving civilisation that detonated it, unless it was mass suicide of course?
All these need to be answered before looking for a man made solution, unless you are suggesting a LGM solution of course.
Before coming to any conclusion, how ever possible or improbable I would want answers to the above questions, give me those and you might even have a convert, 'cos without that info your belief is simply that.
Follow the evidence they say on the crime programmes, certainly, just point me at it.

Roy.