Archaeologica.org

I think it would be fair to point out that without your presense there would have been no political banter. Takes two you know, so perhaps you should follow your own advise?

Roy.

Digit wrote:I think it would be fair to point out that without your presense there would have been no political banter. Takes two you know, so perhaps you should follow your own advise?

I'm not 'following' my own adviCe, Roy. I conceived of it, presented the suggestion, and am actually doing it right now.
If there is anyone who could, should, or might 'follow' here, it is you. Or not, as the case may be. Good luck with it.

I choose not to ta!, and if you don't argue with me then there will be no banter, choice is yours.

Roy.

But an archaeology/paleontology board isn't the place for political banter.

We do have an "Everything Else" forum for...um..."everything else."

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can "throw the rascals out" at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy."

Carrol Quigley, member of the Council on Foreign Relations and author of Tragedy and Hope (1975)